Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: The venestent study

Clara E. E. Hanekamp; Jacques J. Koolen; Peter den Heijer; Martin J. Schalij; Jan J. Piek; Frits W. H. M. Bär; Iwan de Scheerder; Hans J. R. M. Bonnier; Nico H. J. Pijls

doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692

Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: The venestent study

Clara E. E. Hanekamp, Jacques J. Koolen, Peter den Heijer, Martin J. Schalij, Jan J. Piek, Frits W. H. M. Bär, Iwan de Scheerder, Hans J. R. M. Bonnier, Nico H. J. Pijls

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1 % in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31.4% vs. 14.5% (P <0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P <0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	452-457
Journal	Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Volume	60
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692
Publication status	Published - 2003

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692

Cite this

Hanekamp, C. E. E., Koolen, J. J., den Heijer, P., Schalij, M. J., Piek, J. J., Bär, F. W. H. M., de Scheerder, I., Bonnier, H. J. R. M., & Pijls, N. H. J. (2003). Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: The venestent study. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 60(4), 452-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692

@article{73dc04bbab054e2d8411d346d02c7554,

title = "Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: The venestent study",

abstract = "The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1 % in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31.4% vs. 14.5% (P <0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P <0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc",

author = "Hanekamp, {Clara E. E.} and Koolen, {Jacques J.} and {den Heijer}, Peter and Schalij, {Martin J.} and Piek, {Jan J.} and B{\"a}r, {Frits W. H. M.} and {de Scheerder}, Iwan and Bonnier, {Hans J. R. M.} and Pijls, {Nico H. J.}",

year = "2003",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "452--457",

journal = "Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",

publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: The venestent study

AU - Hanekamp, Clara E. E.

AU - Koolen, Jacques J.

AU - den Heijer, Peter

AU - Schalij, Martin J.

AU - Piek, Jan J.

AU - Bär, Frits W. H. M.

AU - de Scheerder, Iwan

AU - Bonnier, Hans J. R. M.

AU - Pijls, Nico H. J.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1 % in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31.4% vs. 14.5% (P <0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P <0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc

AB - The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1 % in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31.4% vs. 14.5% (P <0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P <0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692

DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10692

M3 - Article

C2 - 14624420

SN - 1522-1946

VL - 60

SP - 452

EP - 457

JO - Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions

JF - Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions

IS - 4

ER -