Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: Results from the EPoS trials

Frederik Emil Juul, Kjetil Garborg, Eugen Nesbakken, Magnus Løberg, Paulina Wieszczy, Joaquín Cubiella, Mette Kalager, Michael F. Kaminski, Rune Erichsen, Hans-Olov Adami, Monika Ferlitsch, Siv K. B. Furholm, Ann G. Zauber, Enrique Quintero, Marek Bugajski, Øyvind Holme, Evelien Dekker, Rodrigo Jover, Michael Bretthauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: High-quality colonoscopy (adequate bowel preparation, whole-colon visualisation and removal of all neoplastic polyps) is a prerequisite to start polyp surveillance, and is ideally achieved in one colonoscopy. In a large multinational polyp surveillance trial, we aimed to investigate clinical practice variation in number of colonoscopies needed to enrol patients with low-risk and high-risk adenomas in polyp surveillance. Design: We retrieved data of all patients with low-risk adenomas (one or two tubular adenomas <10 mm with low-grade dysplasia) and high-risk adenomas (3-10 adenomas, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or villous components) in the European Polyp Surveillance trials fulfilling certain logistic and methodologic criteria. We analysed variations in number of colonoscopies needed to achieve high-quality colonoscopy and enter polyp surveillance by endoscopy centre, and by endoscopists who enrolled ≥30 patients. Results: The study comprised 15 581 patients from 38 endoscopy centres in five European countries; 6794 patients had low-risk and 8787 had high-risk adenomas. 961 patients (6.2%, 95% CI 5.8% to 6.6%) underwent two or more colonoscopies before surveillance began; 101 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.8%) in the low-risk group and 860 (9.8%, 95% CI 9.2% to 10.4%) in the high-risk group. Main reasons were poor bowel preparation (21.3%) or incomplete colonoscopy/polypectomy (14.4%) or planned second procedure (27.8%). Need of repeat colonoscopy varied between study centres ranging from 0% to 11.8% in low-risk adenoma patients and from 0% to 63.9% in high-risk adenoma patients. On the second colonoscopy, the two most common reasons for a repeat (third) colonoscopy were piecemeal resection (26.5%) and unspecified reason (23.9%). Conclusion: There is considerable practice variation in the number of colonoscopies performed to achieve complete polyp removal, indicating need for targeted quality improvement to reduce patient burden. Trial registration number: NCT02319928.

Original languageEnglish
Article number327696
JournalGut
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2022

Keywords

  • COLONOSCOPY
  • ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY
  • POLYP
  • SURVEILLANCE

Cite this