Readmission after thoracic endovascular aortic repair following blunt thoracic aortic injury

Anne-Sophie C. Romijn, Jefferson A. Proaño-Zamudio, Vinamr Rastogi, Sai Divya Yadavalli, Emanuele Lagazzi, Georgios F. Giannakopoulos, Marc L. Schermerhorn, Noelle N. Saillant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized to treat blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), but post-discharge outcomes remain underexplored. We examined 90-day readmission in patients treated with TEVAR following BTAI. Methods: Adult patients discharged alive after TEVAR for BTAI in the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2016 and 2019 were included. Outcomes examined were 90-day non-elective readmission, primary readmission reasons, and 90-day mortality. As a complementary analysis, 90-day outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI were compared with those following TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Results: We identified 2085 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI. The median age was 43 years (IQR, 29–58), 65% of all patients had an ISS ≥ 25, and 13% were readmitted within 90 days. The main primary causes for readmission were sepsis (8.8%), wound complications (6.7%), and neurological complications (6.5%). Two patients developed graft thrombosis as primary readmission reasons. Compared with acute TBAD patients, BTAI patients had a significantly lower rate of readmission within 90 days (BTAI vs. TBAD; 13% vs. 29%; p <.001). Conclusion: We found a significant proportion of readmission in patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI. However, the 90-day readmission rate after TEVAR for BTAI was significantly lower compared with acute TBAD, and the common cause for readmission was not related to residual aortic disease or vascular devices. This represents an important distinction from other patient populations treated with TEVAR for acute vascular conditions. Elucidating differences between trauma-related TEVAR readmissions and non-traumatic indications better informs both the clinician and patients of expected post-discharge course. Level of evidence/study type: IV, Therapeutic/care management.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Keywords

  • Blunt thoracic aortic injury
  • Endovascular device
  • Readmission
  • TEVAR

Cite this