Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. A Cochrane review (dagger)

Madelon van Wely, Irene Kwan, Anna L. Burt, Jane Thomas, Andy Vail, Fulco van der Veen, Hesham G. Al-Inany

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Access to Document

@article{d4c45d930da94dc7bc3a4766195e5c55,

title = "Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. A Cochrane review (dagger)",

author = "{van Wely}, Madelon and Irene Kwan and Burt, {Anna L.} and Jane Thomas and Andy Vail and {van der Veen}, Fulco and Al-Inany, {Hesham G.}",

year = "2012",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr048",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "111",

journal = "Human Reproduction Update",

issn = "1355-4786",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. A Cochrane review (dagger)

AU - van Wely, Madelon

AU - Kwan, Irene

AU - Burt, Anna L.

AU - Thomas, Jane

AU - Vail, Andy

AU - van der Veen, Fulco

AU - Al-Inany, Hesham G.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr048

DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr048

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 22301671

SN - 1355-4786

VL - 18

SP - 111

JO - Human Reproduction Update

JF - Human Reproduction Update

IS - 2

ER -