Reply - Letter to the editor: Reconsidering 1.2-1.5 g/kg as beneficially high protein provision in critically ill patients

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{6a81c03723834c4fb2822414405cdcb5,

title = "Reply - Letter to the editor: Reconsidering 1.2-1.5 g/kg as beneficially high protein provision in critically ill patients",

author = "{van Ruijven}, {Isabel M} and Brunsveld-Reinders, {Anja H} and Stapel, {Sandra N} and Weijs, {Peter J M}",

year = "2023",

month = nov,

day = "29",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2023.11.035",

language = "English",

journal = "Clinical Nutrition",

issn = "0261-5614",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply - Letter to the editor

T2 - Reconsidering 1.2-1.5 g/kg as beneficially high protein provision in critically ill patients

AU - van Ruijven, Isabel M

AU - Brunsveld-Reinders, Anja H

AU - Stapel, Sandra N

AU - Weijs, Peter J M

PY - 2023/11/29

Y1 - 2023/11/29

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2023.11.035

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2023.11.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 38049354

SN - 0261-5614

JO - Clinical Nutrition

JF - Clinical Nutrition

ER -