Reply: Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?

Reply: Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each ¹⁸F-labelled tracer?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1274-1275
Number of pages	2
Journal	European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Volume	45
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4007-2
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2018

@article{fc603e4b3772494380971ef5f45cf074,

title = "Reply: Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?",

author = "Kramer, {G. M.} and Hoekstra, {O. S.} and R. Boellaard",

year = "2018",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4007-2",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "1274--1275",

journal = "European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging",

issn = "1619-7070",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply

T2 - Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?

AU - Kramer, G. M.

AU - Hoekstra, O. S.

AU - Boellaard, R.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045245058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4007-2

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4007-2

M3 - Letter

C2 - 29654344

SN - 1619-7070

VL - 45

SP - 1274

EP - 1275

JO - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging

JF - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging

IS - 7

ER -