Reproducibility and validity of the myotest for measuring step frequency and ground contact time in recreational runners

Vincent Gouttebarge, Robin Wolfard, Nouschka Griek, Cornelis J. de Ruiter, Julitta S. Boschman, Jaap H. van Dieën

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility (test-retest reliability and agreement) and concurrent validity of the Myotest for measuring step frequency (SF) and ground contact time (GCT) in recreational runners. Based on a within-subjects design (test and retest), SF and GCT of 14 participants (11 males, 3 females) were measured at three different running speeds with the Myotest during two test sessions. SF and GCT were also assessed with a foot-mounted accelerometer (Gold Standard, previously validated by comparing to force plate data) during the first test session. Levels of test-retest reliability and concurrent validity were expressed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), agreement with standard errors of measurement (SEM). For SF, test-retest reliability (ICC's > 0.75) and agreement of the Myotest were considered as good at all running speeds. For GCT, test-retest reliability was found to be moderate at a running speed of 14 km/h and poor at speeds of 10 and 12 km/h (ICC <0.50). Agreement of the Myotest for GCT at all three running speeds was considered not acceptable given the SEM's calculated. Concurrent validity of the Myotest with the foot-mounted accelerometer (Gold Standard) at all three running speeds was found to be good for SF (ICC's > 0.75) and moderate for GCT (0.50 <ICC's <0.75). The conclusion of our study is that estimates obtained with the Myotest are reproducible and valid for SF but not for GCT
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-26
JournalJournal of human kinetics
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this