Response to: 'Let's not fool ourselves. In RA, the ACR/EULAR remission criteria are not perfect!' by Baker et al

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Annals of the rheumatic diseases
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210799
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2016

Access to Document

@article{5060b1fe4eda4098a0343b6a385fba3b,

title = "Response to: 'Let's not fool ourselves. In RA, the ACR/EULAR remission criteria are not perfect!' by Baker et al",

author = "Maarten Boers",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210799",

language = "English",

journal = "Annals of the rheumatic diseases",

issn = "0003-4967",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to: 'Let's not fool ourselves. In RA, the ACR/EULAR remission criteria are not perfect!' by Baker et al

AU - Boers, Maarten

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210799

DO - https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210799

M3 - Letter

C2 - 27934679

SN - 0003-4967

JO - Annals of the rheumatic diseases

JF - Annals of the rheumatic diseases

ER -