Restraint interventions in people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities: Perspectives of support staff and family members

Petri J. C. M. Embregts, Annemarieke Negenman, Jolanda M. Habraken, Marike E. de Boer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Cees M. P. M. Hertogh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Due to incompatibilities in communication, it is key that family members and support staff can take the perspective of people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (ID) whilst putting aside their own perspectives. Method: Ten vignettes describing types of restraint interventions (RIs) were presented to 20 unique pairs of support staff and family members related to individuals with moderate to profound ID. Results: In taking their own perspective, more than half of the support staff and family members perceived all RIs as involuntary and severe. In contrast, when asked to put themselves in the position of the client/family member, only three RIs were considered involuntary by a majority of support staff and family members. Conclusions: These results indicate that support staff and family members can take into account the perspective of people with moderate to profound ID in the evaluation and consideration of involuntary care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-183
Number of pages12
JournalJOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Cite this