TY - JOUR
T1 - Restraint interventions in people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities: Perspectives of support staff and family members
AU - Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
AU - Negenman, Annemarieke
AU - Habraken, Jolanda M.
AU - de Boer, Marike E.
AU - Frederiks, Brenda J. M.
AU - Hertogh, Cees M. P. M.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Background: Due to incompatibilities in communication, it is key that family members and support staff can take the perspective of people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (ID) whilst putting aside their own perspectives. Method: Ten vignettes describing types of restraint interventions (RIs) were presented to 20 unique pairs of support staff and family members related to individuals with moderate to profound ID. Results: In taking their own perspective, more than half of the support staff and family members perceived all RIs as involuntary and severe. In contrast, when asked to put themselves in the position of the client/family member, only three RIs were considered involuntary by a majority of support staff and family members. Conclusions: These results indicate that support staff and family members can take into account the perspective of people with moderate to profound ID in the evaluation and consideration of involuntary care.
AB - Background: Due to incompatibilities in communication, it is key that family members and support staff can take the perspective of people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (ID) whilst putting aside their own perspectives. Method: Ten vignettes describing types of restraint interventions (RIs) were presented to 20 unique pairs of support staff and family members related to individuals with moderate to profound ID. Results: In taking their own perspective, more than half of the support staff and family members perceived all RIs as involuntary and severe. In contrast, when asked to put themselves in the position of the client/family member, only three RIs were considered involuntary by a majority of support staff and family members. Conclusions: These results indicate that support staff and family members can take into account the perspective of people with moderate to profound ID in the evaluation and consideration of involuntary care.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052911528&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191671
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12519
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12519
M3 - Article
C2 - 30191671
SN - 1360-2322
VL - 32
SP - 172
EP - 183
JO - JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
JF - JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
IS - 1
ER -