Retrieval of the Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker: A Multicenter Experience

Vivek Y. Reddy, Marc A. Miller, Reinoud E. Knops, Petr Neuzil, Pascal Defaye, Werner Jung, Rahul Doshi, Mark Castellani, Adam Strickberger, R. Hardwin Mead, Harish Doppalapudi, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Matthew Bennett, Johannes Sperzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Leadless cardiac pacemakers have emerged as a safe and effective alternative to conventional transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers. Herein, we report a multicenter experience on the feasibility and safety of acute retrieval ( <6 weeks) and chronic retrieval (>6 weeks) of the leadless cardiac pacemaker in humans. This study included patients enrolled in 3 multicenter trials, who received a leadless cardiac pacemaker implant and who subsequently underwent a device removal attempt. The overall leadless pacemaker retrieval success rate was 94%: for patients whose leadless cardiac pacemaker had been implanted for <6 weeks (acute retrieval cohort), complete retrieval was achieved in 100% (n=5/5); for those implanted for ≥ 6 weeks (chronic retrieval cohort), retrieval was achieved in 91% (n=10/11) of patients. The mean duration of time from implant to retrieval attempt was 346 days (range, 88-1188 days) in the chronic retrieval cohort, and nearly two thirds (n=7; 63%) had been implanted for >6 months before the retrieval attempt. There were no procedure-related adverse events at 30 days post retrieval procedure. This multicenter experience demonstrated the feasibility and safety of retrieving a chronically implanted single-chamber (right ventricle) active fixation leadless pacemaker. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02051972, NCT02030418, and NCT01700244
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e004626
JournalCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this