Return to work of workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: design of a randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workers without a permanent employment contract represent a vulnerable group within the working population. Mental disorders are a major cause of sickness absence within this group. Common mental disorders are stress-related, depressive and anxiety disorders. To date, little attention has been paid to effective return to work interventions for this type of sick-listed workers. Therefore, a participatory supportive return to work program has been developed. It combines elements of a participatory return to work program, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job.The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program compared to care as usual.

METHODS/DESIGN: The cost-effectiveness of the participatory supportive return to work program will be examined in a randomised controlled trial with a follow-up of twelve months.The program strongly involves the sick-listed worker in the identification of obstacles for return to work and possible solutions, resulting in a consensus based action plan. This plan will be used as a starting point for the search of suitable competitive employment with support of a rehabilitation agency. During this process the insurance physician of the sick-listed worker contacts other caregivers to promote integrated care.Workers eligible to participate in this study have no permanent employment contract, have applied for a sickness benefit at the Dutch Social Security Agency and are sick-listed between two and fourteen weeks due to mental health problems.The primary outcome measure is the duration until first sustainable return to work in a competitive job. Outcomes are measured at baseline and after three, six, nine and twelve months.

DISCUSSION: If the participatory supportive return to work program proves to be cost-effective, the social security system, the sick-listed worker and society as a whole will benefit. A cost-effective return to work program will lead to a reduction of costs related to sickness absence. For the sick-listed worker a cost-effective program results in earlier sustainable return to work, which can be associated with both social and health benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number and date is NTR3563, August 7, 2012.

Original languageEnglish
Article number594
Pages (from-to)594
JournalBMC public health
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Employment/economics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders/economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Occupational Health Services/economics
  • Program Evaluation
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Return to Work/statistics & numerical data
  • Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this