Risks of vaginal breech delivery at term compared to elective cesarean section--reply to comment by Page

Floortje Vlemmix; Ben Willem Mol; Marjolein Kok

doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603

Risks of vaginal breech delivery at term compared to elective cesarean section--reply to comment by Page

Floortje Vlemmix, Ben Willem Mol, Marjolein Kok

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We thank Mr Page (1) for his interest in our work (2). We agree with many of the points of concern that he addresses, and in fact we have already discussed many of them in our paper. Our study was retrospective and we could not apply an intention to treat approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	442
Journal	Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume	94
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603

Cite this

@article{ac5d2ef2510a436b944bacbf096532d2,

title = "Risks of vaginal breech delivery at term compared to elective cesarean section--reply to comment by Page",

abstract = "We thank Mr Page (1) for his interest in our work (2). We agree with many of the points of concern that he addresses, and in fact we have already discussed many of them in our paper. Our study was retrospective and we could not apply an intention to treat approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved",

author = "Floortje Vlemmix and Mol, {Ben Willem} and Marjolein Kok",

year = "2015",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603",

language = "English",

volume = "94",

pages = "442",

journal = "Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica",

issn = "0001-6349",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risks of vaginal breech delivery at term compared to elective cesarean section--reply to comment by Page

AU - Vlemmix, Floortje

AU - Mol, Ben Willem

AU - Kok, Marjolein

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We thank Mr Page (1) for his interest in our work (2). We agree with many of the points of concern that he addresses, and in fact we have already discussed many of them in our paper. Our study was retrospective and we could not apply an intention to treat approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

AB - We thank Mr Page (1) for his interest in our work (2). We agree with many of the points of concern that he addresses, and in fact we have already discussed many of them in our paper. Our study was retrospective and we could not apply an intention to treat approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12603

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 25676439

SN - 0001-6349

VL - 94

SP - 442

JO - Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica

IS - 4

ER -