RSA migration of unicondylar knee arthroplasties is comparable to migration of total knee arthroplasties: A meta-analysis

Importance: Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), early migration as measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a strong predictor of late revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Migration in the first two years provides information on the fixation of an implant. However, the migration pattern of UKAs has not been systematically determined, and it is unclear if the migration pattern of UKAs is similar to that of TKAs. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the migration patterns of tibial components of UKAs. Evidence review: All RSA studies reporting on migration at two or more postoperative time-points following UKA were included. Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched up to April 2021. The risk of bias was assessed using the methodological score of the Assessment of Quality in Lower Limb Arthroplasty tool. All phases of the review were performed by two reviewers independently. A random-effects model was applied to pool the migration data. Findings: The literature search yielded 3,187 hits, of which ten studies were included, comprising 13 study groups and 381 UKAs. The majority of the early migration occurred in the first 6 months postoperatively followed by a period of very little migration, similar to what is reported for TKAs. The pooled mean migration expressed as the maximum total point motion of all UKAs at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.38–0.48), 0.54 mm (95% CI 0.40–0.67), 0.59 mm (95% CI 0.52–0.66), and 0.61 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.68), respectively. Migration at one year and two years was higher than migration of TKAs as reported in previous studies. All-polyethylene UKAs migrated more at one year (0.69 mm; 95% CI 0.58–0.80) than metal-backed UKAs (0.52 mm; 95% CI 0.46–0.58). Conclusions and relevance: The migration pattern of UKAs is comparable with that of TKAs in the first two years as both types of implants show initial migration in the first few months and very little migration thereafter. However, UKAs had higher migration at 1-year and 2-year follow-up.