TY - JOUR
T1 - Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
AU - Scirica, Benjamin M.
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Braunwald, Eugene
AU - Steg, P. Gabriel
AU - Davidson, Jaime
AU - Hirshberg, Boaz
AU - Ohman, Peter
AU - Frederich, Robert
AU - Wiviott, Stephen D.
AU - Hoffman, Elaine B.
AU - Cavender, Matthew A.
AU - Udell, Jacob A.
AU - Desai, Nihar R.
AU - Mosenzon, Ofri
AU - McGuire, Darren K.
AU - Ray, Kausik K.
AU - Leiter, Lawrence A.
AU - Raz, Itamar
AU - AUTHOR GROUP
AU - Desai, Nihar
AU - Abrahamsen, Timothy
AU - Grossman, Michelle
AU - Morin, Suzanne
AU - Im, KyungAh
AU - Hoffman, Elaine
AU - Gabovitch, Daniel
AU - Pricken, Alexandra
AU - Buskila, Alona
AU - Stahre, Christina
AU - Price, Deborah
AU - Billing-Clason, Solveig
AU - Sabel, Karin
AU - Monyak, John
AU - Sjöstrand, Mikalea
AU - Wei, Cheryl
AU - Lu, Jane
AU - Miller, Elinor
AU - Raichlen, Joel
AU - Fitt, Sandy
AU - Iqbal, Nayyar
AU - Donovan, Mark
AU - Davidson, Jaime A.
AU - Steg, Ph Gabriel
AU - Aguilar-Salinas, Carlos
AU - Alvarsson, Michael
AU - Amerena, John
AU - Ardissino, Diego
AU - Hoekstra, Joost
AU - Kastelein, John
AU - Wang, J.
AU - Nieuwdorp, M.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of many current antihyperglycemic agents, including saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, are unclear. We randomly assigned 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events to receive saxagliptin or placebo and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Physicians were permitted to adjust other medications, including antihyperglycemic agents. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. A primary end-point event occurred in 613 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 609 patients in the placebo group (7.3% and 7.2%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio with saxagliptin, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.12; P=0.99 for superiority; P <0.001 for noninferiority); the results were similar in the "on-treatment" analysis (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.17). The major secondary end point of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or heart failure occurred in 1059 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 1034 patients in the placebo group (12.8% and 12.4%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.11; P=0.66). More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure (3.5% vs. 2.8%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51; P=0.007). Rates of adjudicated cases of acute and chronic pancreatitis were similar in the two groups (acute pancreatitis, 0.3% in the saxagliptin group and 0.2% in the placebo group; chronic pancreatitis, <0.1% and 0.1% in the two groups, respectively). DPP-4 inhibition with saxagliptin did not increase or decrease the rate of ischemic events, though the rate of hospitalization for heart failure was increased. Although saxagliptin improves glycemic control, other approaches are necessary to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; SAVOR-TIMI 53 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01107886.)
AB - The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of many current antihyperglycemic agents, including saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, are unclear. We randomly assigned 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events to receive saxagliptin or placebo and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Physicians were permitted to adjust other medications, including antihyperglycemic agents. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. A primary end-point event occurred in 613 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 609 patients in the placebo group (7.3% and 7.2%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio with saxagliptin, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.12; P=0.99 for superiority; P <0.001 for noninferiority); the results were similar in the "on-treatment" analysis (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.17). The major secondary end point of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or heart failure occurred in 1059 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 1034 patients in the placebo group (12.8% and 12.4%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.11; P=0.66). More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure (3.5% vs. 2.8%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51; P=0.007). Rates of adjudicated cases of acute and chronic pancreatitis were similar in the two groups (acute pancreatitis, 0.3% in the saxagliptin group and 0.2% in the placebo group; chronic pancreatitis, <0.1% and 0.1% in the two groups, respectively). DPP-4 inhibition with saxagliptin did not increase or decrease the rate of ischemic events, though the rate of hospitalization for heart failure was increased. Although saxagliptin improves glycemic control, other approaches are necessary to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; SAVOR-TIMI 53 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01107886.)
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307684
DO - https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307684
M3 - Article
C2 - 23992601
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 369
SP - 1317
EP - 1326
JO - New England journal of medicine
JF - New England journal of medicine
IS - 14
ER -