TY - JOUR
T1 - Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma
T2 - A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project
AU - D'agostino, Mattia
AU - Cairns, David A.
AU - Lahuerta, Juan José
AU - Wester, Ruth
AU - Bertsch, Uta
AU - Waage, Anders
AU - Zamagni, Elena
AU - Mateos, María-Victoria
AU - Dall'olio, Daniele
AU - van de Donk, Niels W. C. J.
AU - Jackson, Graham
AU - Rocchi, Serena
AU - Salwender, Hans
AU - Bladé Creixenti, Joan
AU - van der Holt, Bronno
AU - Castellani, Gastone
AU - Bonello, Francesca
AU - Capra, Andrea
AU - Mai, Elias K.
AU - Dürig, Jan
AU - Gay, Francesca
AU - Zweegman, Sonja
AU - Cavo, Michele
AU - Kaiser, Martin F.
AU - Goldschmidt, Hartmut
AU - Hernández Rivas, Jesús María
AU - Larocca, Alessandra
AU - Cook, Gordon
AU - San-Miguel, Jesús F.
AU - Boccadoro, Mario
AU - Sonneveld, Pieter
N1 - Funding Information: HARMONY and HARMONY PLUS are funded through the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), Europe's largest public-private initiative aiming to speed up the development of better and safer medicines for patients. Funding is received from the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking and is listed under grant agreement for HARMONY No. 116026 and grant agreement for HARMONY PLUS No. 945406. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The communication included in this contribution reflects the authors' view. Neither IMI nor the European Union, EFPIA, or any Associated Partners are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Funding Information: Supported by the IMI-JU funded project HARMONY, Grant Agreement #116026. No professional medical writer was involved in any portion of the preparation of this manuscript. The analysis of the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Myeloma XI trial was supported by Myeloma UK and received infrastructure support by the NIHR Biomedical Research Center at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital. The UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Myeloma XI trial was funded by Cancer Research UK (Primary Funder [C1298/A10410; C7852/ A25447]). M.F.K. was supported by a Jacquelin Forbes-Nixon Fellowship. Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - PURPOSEPatients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) show heterogeneous outcomes, and approximately 60% of them are at intermediate-risk according to the Revised International Staging system (R-ISS), the standard-of-care risk stratification model. Moreover, chromosome 1q gain/amplification (1q+) recently proved to be a poor prognostic factor. In this study, we revised the R-ISS by analyzing the additive value of each single risk feature, including 1q+.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe European Myeloma Network, within the HARMONY project, collected individual data from 10,843 patients with NDMM enrolled in 16 clinical trials. An additive scoring system on the basis of top features predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was developed and validated.RESULTSIn the training set (N = 7,072), at a median follow-up of 75 months, ISS, del(17p), lactate dehydrogenase, t(4;14), and 1q+ had the highest impact on PFS and OS. These variables were all simultaneously present in 2,226 patients. A value was assigned to each risk feature according to their OS impact (ISS-III 1.5, ISS-II 1, del(17p) 1, high lactate dehydrogenase 1, and 1q+ 0.5 points). Patients were stratified into four risk groups according to the total additive score: low (Second Revision of the International Staging System [R2-ISS]-I, 19.2%, 0 points), low-intermediate (II, 30.8%, 0.5-1 points), intermediate-high (III, 41.2%, 1.5-2.5 points), high (IV, 8.8%, 3-5 points). Median OS was not reached versus 109.2 versus 68.5 versus 37.9 months, and median PFS was 68 versus 45.5 versus 30.2 versus 19.9 months, respectively. The score was validated in an independent validation set (N = 3,771, of whom 1,214 were with complete data to calculate R2-ISS) maintaining its prognostic value.CONCLUSIONThe R2-ISS is a simple prognostic staging system allowing a better stratification of patients with intermediate-risk NDMM. The additive nature of this score fosters its future implementation with new prognostic variables.
AB - PURPOSEPatients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) show heterogeneous outcomes, and approximately 60% of them are at intermediate-risk according to the Revised International Staging system (R-ISS), the standard-of-care risk stratification model. Moreover, chromosome 1q gain/amplification (1q+) recently proved to be a poor prognostic factor. In this study, we revised the R-ISS by analyzing the additive value of each single risk feature, including 1q+.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe European Myeloma Network, within the HARMONY project, collected individual data from 10,843 patients with NDMM enrolled in 16 clinical trials. An additive scoring system on the basis of top features predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was developed and validated.RESULTSIn the training set (N = 7,072), at a median follow-up of 75 months, ISS, del(17p), lactate dehydrogenase, t(4;14), and 1q+ had the highest impact on PFS and OS. These variables were all simultaneously present in 2,226 patients. A value was assigned to each risk feature according to their OS impact (ISS-III 1.5, ISS-II 1, del(17p) 1, high lactate dehydrogenase 1, and 1q+ 0.5 points). Patients were stratified into four risk groups according to the total additive score: low (Second Revision of the International Staging System [R2-ISS]-I, 19.2%, 0 points), low-intermediate (II, 30.8%, 0.5-1 points), intermediate-high (III, 41.2%, 1.5-2.5 points), high (IV, 8.8%, 3-5 points). Median OS was not reached versus 109.2 versus 68.5 versus 37.9 months, and median PFS was 68 versus 45.5 versus 30.2 versus 19.9 months, respectively. The score was validated in an independent validation set (N = 3,771, of whom 1,214 were with complete data to calculate R2-ISS) maintaining its prognostic value.CONCLUSIONThe R2-ISS is a simple prognostic staging system allowing a better stratification of patients with intermediate-risk NDMM. The additive nature of this score fosters its future implementation with new prognostic variables.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132516085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02614
DO - https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02614
M3 - Article
C2 - 35605179
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 364
JO - Journal of clinical oncology
JF - Journal of clinical oncology
M1 - JCO.21.02614
ER -