Severe Postictal Confusion After Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES: Severe postictal confusion (sPIC) is an important but poorly investigated adverse effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). In this retrospective study, prevalence of sPIC and potential risk factors were explored. METHODS: Medical charts of 295 ECT patients (mean ± SD age, 57 ± 15 years; male, 36%) were scrutinized for occurrence of sPIC, as well as demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Patients showing sPIC were compared with patients who did not, using univariate statistics. Multivariate analyses with a split-sample validation procedure were used to assess whether predictive models could be developed using independent data sets. RESULTS: O 295 patients, 74 (25.1%) showed sPIC. All patients showing sPIC needed extra medication, 9% (n = 7) required physically restraints, and 5% (n = 4) had to be secluded. Univariate analyses showed several trends: patients with sPIC were more often males (P = 0.05), had more often history of cerebrovascular incident (P = 0.02), did not use concomitant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (P = 0.01), received higher median dosage of succinylcholine (P = 0.02), and received pretreatment with flumazenil more often (P = 0.07), but these associations did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Multiple logistic regression analysis did not result in a model that could predict sPIC in the holdout data set. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective naturalistic study in 295 ECT patients, the prevalence of sPIC appeared to be 25%. Patients showing sPIC were characterized by male sex, history of cerebrovascular incident, use of higher-dose succinylcholine, and pretreatment with flumazenil. However, multivariate analysis revealed no significant model to predict sPIC in independent data.