Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women have been associated with higher rates of recurrent events after percutaneous coronary intervention than men, possibly attributable to advanced age at presentation and greater comorbidities. These factors also put women at higher risk of bleeding, which may influence therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 postapproval registries to evaluate sex-related differences in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. HBR required fulfillment of at least 1 major or 2 minor criteria of the Academic Research Consortium definition. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis). Of the total 10 502 patients, 2832 (27.0%) were women. The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men (29.0% versus 20.5%, P<0.0001). Women at HBR were older and had more comorbidities, while men at HBR were more often smokers, with prior myocardial infarction and more complex coronary lesions. At 4 years, women at HBR had significantly higher major bleeding compared with men at HBR (10.8% versus 6.2%, P<0.0001); however, this difference was attenuated after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.41–2.08). Major adverse cardiac event rates between groups were similar (12.2% versus 12.6%, P=0.82) and remained consistent after adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32–1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men, with considerable differences in the distribution of criteria. Women at HBR experienced higher rates of major bleeding but similar major adverse cardiac event rates compared with men at HBR at 4 years.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e014611 |
Journal | Journal of the American Heart Association |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 9 Apr 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Everolimus-eluting stent
- High bleeding risk
- Major bleeding
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Sex
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 9, No. 7, e014611, 09.04.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex-related differences in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
T2 - A patient-level pooled analysis from 4 postapproval studies
AU - Chandiramani, Rishi
AU - Cao, Davide
AU - Claessen, Bimmer E.
AU - Sorrentino, Sabato
AU - Guedeney, Paul
AU - Blum, Moritz
AU - Goel, Ridhima
AU - Roumeliotis, Anastasios
AU - Krucoff, Mitchell
AU - Kozuma, Ken
AU - Ge, Junbo
AU - Seth, Ashok
AU - Makkar, Raj
AU - Bangalore, Sripal
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Angiolillo, Dominick J.
AU - Ruster, Karine
AU - Wang, Jin
AU - Saito, Shigeru
AU - Neumann, Franz Josef
AU - Hermiller, James
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Mehran, Roxana
N1 - Funding Information: Mehran has received institutional research grant support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and OrbusNeich; has served on the executive committee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Osprey Medical Inc.; has served on the data safety monitoring board of Watermark Research Partners; has served as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Abiomed (Spouse), Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Medscape, Siemens Medical Solutions, The Medicines Company (Spouse), Roivant Sciences, Inc, Volcano Corporation and Sanofi; and has equity in Claret Medical Inc. and Elixir Medical Corporation. Krucoff is a consultant and has received research grants from Abbott, Medtronic, OrbusNeich, Biosensors, and Boston Scientific. Angiolillo reports receiving payments as an individual for: consulting fees or honorarium from Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical; and institutional payments for grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, and Renal Guard Solutions. Bangalore serves on the advisory board/received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Reata; has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Seth serves as a consultant/speaker’s bureau for Abbott Vascular. Bhatt discloses the following relationships—advisory board: Cardax, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Medscape Cardiology, PhaseBio, and Regado Biosciences; board of directors: Boston VA Research Institute, Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; chair: American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; data monitoring committees: Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED [CENTERA THV System in Intermediate Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic, Severe, Calcific, Aortic Stenosis Requiring Aortic Valve Replacement] trial, funded by Edwards), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE [Edoxaban Compared to Standard Care After Heart Valve Replacement Using a Catheter in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation] trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo), and Population Health Research Institute; honoraria: American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; vice chair, ACC Accreditation Committee), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI (Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs. Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting] clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II [ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes II] executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (editor in chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees), HMP Global (editor in chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (guest editor; associate editor), Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (chief medical editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (secretary/treasurer), and WebMD (CME steering committees); other: Clinical Cardiology (deputy editor), NCDR’s [National Cardiovascular Data Registry’s] ACTION Registry Steering Committee (chair), and VA CART Research and Publications Committee (chair); research funding: Abbott, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Lilly, Medtronic, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Synaptic, and The Medicines Company; royalties: Elsevier (editor, Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease); site co-investigator: Biotronik, Boston Scientific, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), and Svelte; trustee: American College of Cardiology; unfunded research: FlowCo, Fractyl, Merck, Novo Nordisk, PLx Pharma, and Takeda. Hermiller is a consultant for Abbott. Neumann reports that his institution has received research grants, consultancy fees, and speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, The Medicines Company, Bristol, Novartis, Roche, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Edwards. Kozuma serves as an advisory board member for Abbott Vascular Japan and receives honorarium for lectures. Ruster and Wang are employees of Abbott Vascular. All 4 registries included for this pooled analysis were funded by Abbott. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2020/4/9
Y1 - 2020/4/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: Women have been associated with higher rates of recurrent events after percutaneous coronary intervention than men, possibly attributable to advanced age at presentation and greater comorbidities. These factors also put women at higher risk of bleeding, which may influence therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 postapproval registries to evaluate sex-related differences in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. HBR required fulfillment of at least 1 major or 2 minor criteria of the Academic Research Consortium definition. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis). Of the total 10 502 patients, 2832 (27.0%) were women. The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men (29.0% versus 20.5%, P<0.0001). Women at HBR were older and had more comorbidities, while men at HBR were more often smokers, with prior myocardial infarction and more complex coronary lesions. At 4 years, women at HBR had significantly higher major bleeding compared with men at HBR (10.8% versus 6.2%, P<0.0001); however, this difference was attenuated after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.41–2.08). Major adverse cardiac event rates between groups were similar (12.2% versus 12.6%, P=0.82) and remained consistent after adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32–1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men, with considerable differences in the distribution of criteria. Women at HBR experienced higher rates of major bleeding but similar major adverse cardiac event rates compared with men at HBR at 4 years.
AB - BACKGROUND: Women have been associated with higher rates of recurrent events after percutaneous coronary intervention than men, possibly attributable to advanced age at presentation and greater comorbidities. These factors also put women at higher risk of bleeding, which may influence therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 postapproval registries to evaluate sex-related differences in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. HBR required fulfillment of at least 1 major or 2 minor criteria of the Academic Research Consortium definition. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis). Of the total 10 502 patients, 2832 (27.0%) were women. The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men (29.0% versus 20.5%, P<0.0001). Women at HBR were older and had more comorbidities, while men at HBR were more often smokers, with prior myocardial infarction and more complex coronary lesions. At 4 years, women at HBR had significantly higher major bleeding compared with men at HBR (10.8% versus 6.2%, P<0.0001); however, this difference was attenuated after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.41–2.08). Major adverse cardiac event rates between groups were similar (12.2% versus 12.6%, P=0.82) and remained consistent after adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32–1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBR was higher in women compared with men, with considerable differences in the distribution of criteria. Women at HBR experienced higher rates of major bleeding but similar major adverse cardiac event rates compared with men at HBR at 4 years.
KW - Everolimus-eluting stent
KW - High bleeding risk
KW - Major bleeding
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Sex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082571749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014611
DO - https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014611
M3 - Article
C2 - 32223396
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 9
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 7
M1 - e014611
ER -