Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education

Rami S. Kantar, Corstiaan C. Breugem, Kristen Keith, Serena Kassam, Charanya Vijayakumar, Mikaela Bow, Allyson R. Alfonso, Elsa M. Chahine, Lilian H. Ghotmi, Krishna G. Patel, Pradip R. Shetye, Pedro E. Santiago, Joseph E. Losee, Derek M. Steinbacher, Percy Rossell-Perry, Daniela G. Garib, Nivaldo Alonso, Robert J. Mann, Jose Rolando Prada-Madrid, Elçin EsenlikMaría del Carmen Pamplona, Marcus Vinícius Martins Collares, Ricardo D. Bennun, Ann Kummer, Carlos Giugliano, Bonnie L. Padwa, Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral, Raymond Tse, Brian Sommerlad, Roberto L. Flores, Usama S. Hamdan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P <.001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P <.001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1238-1246
Number of pages9
JournalCleft palate-craniofacial journal
Volume57
Issue number10
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • ethics/health policies
  • lip form
  • lip function
  • oral health
  • palatoplasty

Cite this