TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities
T2 - A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries
AU - EnTIRE consortium
AU - Evans, Natalie
AU - Buljan, Ivan
AU - Valenti, Emanuele
AU - Bouter, Lex
AU - Marušić, Ana
AU - de Vries, Raymond
AU - Widdershoven, Guy
N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Fostering research integrity (RI) increasingly focuses on normative guidance and supportive measures within institutions. To be successful, the implementation of support should be informed by stakeholders' experiences of RI support. This study aims to explore experiences of RI support in Dutch, Spanish and Croatian universities. In total, 59 stakeholders (Netherlands n = 25, Spain n = 17, Croatia n = 17) participated in 16 focus groups in three European countries. Global themes on RI support experiences were identified by thematic analysis. Themes identified were: 'RI governance and institutional implementation', 'RI roles and structures', 'RI education and supervision', and 'Infrastructure, technology and tools supporting daily practice'. Experiences of support differed between countries in relation to: the efforts to translate norms into practice; the extent to which RI oversight was a responsibility of RE structures, or separate RI structures; and the availability of support close to research practice, such as training, responsible supervision, and adequate tools and infrastructure. The study reinforces the importance of a whole institutional approach to RI, embedded within local jurisdictions, rules, and practices. A whole institutional approach puts the emphasis of responsibility on institutions rather than individual researchers. When such an approach is lacking, some stakeholders look for intervention by authorities, such as funders, outside of the university.
AB - Fostering research integrity (RI) increasingly focuses on normative guidance and supportive measures within institutions. To be successful, the implementation of support should be informed by stakeholders' experiences of RI support. This study aims to explore experiences of RI support in Dutch, Spanish and Croatian universities. In total, 59 stakeholders (Netherlands n = 25, Spain n = 17, Croatia n = 17) participated in 16 focus groups in three European countries. Global themes on RI support experiences were identified by thematic analysis. Themes identified were: 'RI governance and institutional implementation', 'RI roles and structures', 'RI education and supervision', and 'Infrastructure, technology and tools supporting daily practice'. Experiences of support differed between countries in relation to: the efforts to translate norms into practice; the extent to which RI oversight was a responsibility of RE structures, or separate RI structures; and the availability of support close to research practice, such as training, responsible supervision, and adequate tools and infrastructure. The study reinforces the importance of a whole institutional approach to RI, embedded within local jurisdictions, rules, and practices. A whole institutional approach puts the emphasis of responsibility on institutions rather than individual researchers. When such an approach is lacking, some stakeholders look for intervention by authorities, such as funders, outside of the university.
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Europe
KW - Focus Groups
KW - Humans
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Research ethics
KW - Research governance
KW - Research integrity guidelines
KW - Research quality
KW - Responsible conduct of research
KW - Universities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137005078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00390-5
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00390-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 36042054
SN - 1353-3452
VL - 28
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Science and Engineering Ethics
JF - Science and Engineering Ethics
IS - 5
M1 - 43
ER -