Stellate ganglion block for the management of hot flashes and sleep disturbances in breast cancer survivors: an uncontrolled experimental study with 24 weeks of follow-up

K. Haest, A. Kumar, B. van Calster, K. Leunen, A. Smeets, F. Amant, P. Berteloot, H. Wildiers, R. Paridaens, E. van Limbergen, C. Weltens, H. Janssen, S. Peeters, J. Menten, I. Vergote, B. Morlion, J. Verhaeghe, M. R. Christiaens, P. Neven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We studied the stellate ganglion block (SGB) recently suggested for the treatment of severe vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbances in breast cancer survivors. Following an initial pilot study, which focused on the acceptability and safety of SGB for this important problem, we evaluated its short-and long-term efficacy. Materials and methods: Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with severe vasomotor symptoms resistant to standard nonhormonal pharmacological intervention were eligible. Diaries were used to measure daily hot flash scores (frequency and intensity) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) during scheduled visits at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks following the SGB. Efficacy data were analyzed using longitudinal regression models. Results: Thirty-four patients participated and none refused the SGB procedure. Most patients received more than one SGB. The pilot study found SGB to be safe. In the main study, hot flash scores were reduced from baseline by 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) -74% to -49%] and 47% (95% CI -62% to -27%) at weeks 1 and 24, respectively. The odds ratio of better sleep quality relative to baseline was 3.4 at week 1 (95% CI 1.6-7.2) and 4.3 at week 24 (95% CI 1.9-9.8). Conclusion: In the short term, SGB appears to be an effective treatment with acceptable morbidity for some breast cancer survivors with therapy-resistant vasomotor symptoms and/or sleep disturbances. Although sleep quality was maintained out to 24 weeks the efficacy of SGB for hot flashes was reduced over time. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1449-1454
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this