Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines

Michael Yan, Alexander V. Louie, Rupesh Kotecha, Md Ashfaq Ahmed, Zhenwei Zhang, Matthias Guckenberger, Mi-Sook Kim, Simon S. Lo, Marta Scorsetti, Alison C. Tree, Arjun Sahgal, Ben J. Slotman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location pose unique safety considerations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current safety and efficacy data and provide practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). Methods: We performed a systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE databases of patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Studies reporting local control (LC) and/or toxicity were included. Studies with <5 treated lesions, non-English language, re-irradiation, nodal tumors, or mixed outcomes in which ultra-central tumors could not be discerned were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting relevant endpoints. Meta-regression was conducted to determine the effect of various covariates on the primary outcomes. Results: 602 unique studies were identified of which 27 (one prospective observational, the remainder retrospective) were included, representing 1183 treated targets. All studies defined ultra-central as the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). The most common dose fractionations were 50 Gy/5, 60 Gy/8, and 60 Gy/12 fractions. The pooled 1- and 2-year LC estimates were 92 % and 89 %, respectively. Meta-regression identified biological effective dose (BED10) as a significant predictor of 1-year LC. A total of 109 grade 3–4 toxicity events, with a pooled incidence of 6 %, were reported, most commonly pneumonitis. There were 73 treatment related deaths, with a pooled incidence of 4 %, with the most common being hemoptysis. Anticoagulation, interstitial lung disease, endobronchial tumor, and concomitant targeted therapies were observed risk factors for fatal toxicity events. Conclusion: SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors results in acceptable rates of local control, albeit with risks of severe toxicity. Caution should be taken for appropriate patient selection, consideration of concomitant therapies, and radiotherapy plan design.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107281
JournalLung Cancer
Volume182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Meta-analysis
  • SBRT
  • Ultra-central

Cite this