TY - JOUR
T1 - Successful tapering of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis with low disease activity
T2 - a large pragmatic daily practice study from the BioDay registry
AU - Spekhorst, Lotte S.
AU - Boesjes, Celeste M.
AU - Loman, Laura
AU - Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
AU - Bakker, Daphne S.
AU - Kamphuis, Esmé
AU - Kamsteeg, Marijke
AU - Haeck, Inge M.
AU - Oosting, Albert J.
AU - van Lumig, Paula P. M.
AU - van Lynden-van Nes, Anneke M. T.
AU - Tupker, Ron A.
AU - Flinterman, Annebeth
AU - Garritsen, Floor M.
AU - Touwslager, Wouter R. H.
AU - de Bruin-Weller, Marjolein S.
AU - Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise A.
AU - de Graaf, Marlies
N1 - Funding Information: Conflicts of interest L.S.S. is a speaker for AbbVie. C.M.B. is a speaker for AbbVie and Eli Lilly. D.S.B. is a speaker for Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Sanofi. I.M.H. is a consultant, advisory board member and/or speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi. R.A.T. is an advisory board member of Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma and Novartis. F.M.G. was an advisory board member and/or speaker for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Sanofi. W.R.H.T. is an advisor, consultant and/ot speaker for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Sanofi. M.S.d.B.-W. is a consultant, advisory board member and/or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Arena, Aslan, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi. M.-L.A.S. is an advisor, consultant, speaker and/or investigator for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi. She has received grants from Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi. M.d.G. is a consultant, advisory board member and/or speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi. The authors not listed here declare no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding patient-centred dosing of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our patient-centred dupilumab dosing regimen in daily practice, to assess prognostic factors for successful tapering and to estimate medication-related cost savings. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study included adult patients with AD, participating in the BioDay registry, treated with dupilumab for ≥ 1.3 years. Interval prolongation was considered in the case of dupilumab standard dose for ≥ 1 year and persistent controlled AD [Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 7; ≥ 6 months]. Primary endpoints were the mean EASI and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-pruritus after the start of tapering. Prognostic factors for successful tapering were analysed with logistic regression and a cost-savings analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were included, of whom 401 patients [mean EASI 2.5 (SD 2.3); NRS-pruritus of 2.4 (SD 1.9) at the start of tapering] prolonged their dupilumab interval. In 83.3% of these patients tapering was successful; most patients used dupilumab every 3 or 4 weeks (Q3W/Q4W). A significant small increase was observed for EASI (highest mean 3.5) and NRS-pruritus (highest mean 3.2) (P < 0.001); however, scores remained low. Predicting successful tapering showed nonsignificant odds ratios for all incorporated variables. The estimated cost savings was €3 977 033.98 for 401 patients between January 2019 and June 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed successful tapering of dupilumab in 83.3% of patients with AD who attempted tapering, while maintaining controlled disease and with the majority using Q3W/Q4W. Interval prolongation can be beneficial both for the patient and from a socio-economic perspective.
AB - BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding patient-centred dosing of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our patient-centred dupilumab dosing regimen in daily practice, to assess prognostic factors for successful tapering and to estimate medication-related cost savings. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study included adult patients with AD, participating in the BioDay registry, treated with dupilumab for ≥ 1.3 years. Interval prolongation was considered in the case of dupilumab standard dose for ≥ 1 year and persistent controlled AD [Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 7; ≥ 6 months]. Primary endpoints were the mean EASI and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-pruritus after the start of tapering. Prognostic factors for successful tapering were analysed with logistic regression and a cost-savings analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were included, of whom 401 patients [mean EASI 2.5 (SD 2.3); NRS-pruritus of 2.4 (SD 1.9) at the start of tapering] prolonged their dupilumab interval. In 83.3% of these patients tapering was successful; most patients used dupilumab every 3 or 4 weeks (Q3W/Q4W). A significant small increase was observed for EASI (highest mean 3.5) and NRS-pruritus (highest mean 3.2) (P < 0.001); however, scores remained low. Predicting successful tapering showed nonsignificant odds ratios for all incorporated variables. The estimated cost savings was €3 977 033.98 for 401 patients between January 2019 and June 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed successful tapering of dupilumab in 83.3% of patients with AD who attempted tapering, while maintaining controlled disease and with the majority using Q3W/Q4W. Interval prolongation can be beneficial both for the patient and from a socio-economic perspective.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165266650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad159
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad159
M3 - Article
C2 - 37177895
SN - 0007-0963
VL - 189
SP - 327
EP - 335
JO - British Journal of Dermatology
JF - British Journal of Dermatology
IS - 3
ER -