Suppression extends to major histocompatibility antigens linked to tolerizing minor histocompatibility antigens, but not the other way round

Frederike Bemelman, Si-La Yong, Rudi Tissingh, Peter Schellekens, Ineke ten Berge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'Active suppression', a mechanism of transplantation tolerance, can spread to newly introduced minor antigens once these antigens are linked to tolerizing antigens. We explored whether this suppression can extend to major histocompatibility (MHC) antigens and whether this phenomenon can be demonstrated once tolerance is induced to a MHC antigen. Mice were tolerized using donor bone marrow plus CD4 and CD8 monoclonal antibodies. The following strain combinations were used: AKR (H-2k) into CBA (H-2k), a multiple minor difference and B6 (H-2b) into B6(bm12) (H-2b), a MHC class II difference. Tolerance was tested by a donorskingraft. CBA mice tolerant to AKR received a second skin carrying either AKR antigens plus additional multiple minor antigens [F1(AKRxBalb.K)] or carrying additional minors and a MHC class I antigen (B10.AKM-H2M). B6(bm12) (H-2b) tolerant to B6 (H-2b) were grafted with skin from a Balb.Bdonor (Balb minors linked to the tolerizing class II antigen) or from a B10.A(3R) strain (a MHC class I antigen linked to the tolerizing class II antigen). CBA mice tolerant to AKR accepted F1(AKRxBalb.K) skin, whereas F1(CBAxBalb.K) were rejected. Rejection of B10.AKM/H2M skin by tolerant mice was delayed as compared with nontolerant mice. Tolerant and nontolerant B6(bm12) mice rejected Balb.B skin and B10.A(3R) skin within the same time. Thus, in this model, suppression was linked to minors. Alloreactivity against minors and majors could be suppressed. Suppression linked to a class II antigen could not be demonstrated
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-428
JournalTransplant international
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Cite this