Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: Is it an issue?

Jeroen Diks, Denise Nio, Matteus A. Linsen, Jan A. Rauwerda, Willem Wisselink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: Manipulation of sutures during endoscopic surgery could lead to damage of suture structure, supposedly resulting in loss of strength. Lack of tactile feedback in robotic surgical systems might increase this problem. The objective of this study is to evaluate suture strength after robotic manipulation and to determine which suture material is least susceptible to damage from robotic manipulation. METHODS: The da Vinci surgical system was used to manipulate sutures. Three different suture materials (Prolene, ePTFE, Ethibond) of 3 different sizes (3-0, 4-0, and 5-0) were tested. A total of 270 sutures were pulled on a Servohydraulic Universal Testing Machine. The frequency of breaks at a manipulation-point and the maximum applied force (N) before the suture broke were used for statistic analysis. RESULTS: No loss in strength was shown in the ePTFE sutures after manipulation, whereas both Prolene and Ethibond sutures showed a significant loss of strength. CONCLUSIONS: ePTFE sutures are least susceptible to robotic manipulations and are, therefore, to be considered as a material of first choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)524-527
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007


  • RALS
  • Robot
  • Robotic surgery
  • Suture material
  • Vascular

Cite this