TY - JOUR
T1 - Technical Note on Three- and Four-Wall Orbital Reconstructions With Patient-Specific Implants
AU - Sabelis, Juliana F.
AU - Youssef, Stephen A. L. Y.
AU - Hoefnagels, Friso W. A.
AU - Becking, Alfred G.
AU - Schreurs, Ruud
AU - Dubois, Leander
N1 - Funding Information: Funding for this research was received by KLS Martin and Brainlab AG. None of the funding parties had any involvement in the contents or decision to submit the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - AbstractOrbital reconstruction is one of the most complex procedures in maxillofacial surgery. It becomes even more complex when all references to the original anatomy are lost. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of techniques for complex three- and four-wall orbital reconstructions. Preoperative virtual surgical planning is essential when considering different reconstruction possibilities. The considerations that may lead to different approaches are described, and the advantages and drawbacks of each technique are evaluated. It is recommended to reconstruct solitary three-wall or four-wall orbital defects with multiple patientspecific implants. Optimizations of this treatment protocol are suggested, and their effects on predictability are demonstrated in a case presentation of a four-wall defect reconstruction with multiple patient-specific implants.
AB - AbstractOrbital reconstruction is one of the most complex procedures in maxillofacial surgery. It becomes even more complex when all references to the original anatomy are lost. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of techniques for complex three- and four-wall orbital reconstructions. Preoperative virtual surgical planning is essential when considering different reconstruction possibilities. The considerations that may lead to different approaches are described, and the advantages and drawbacks of each technique are evaluated. It is recommended to reconstruct solitary three-wall or four-wall orbital defects with multiple patientspecific implants. Optimizations of this treatment protocol are suggested, and their effects on predictability are demonstrated in a case presentation of a four-wall defect reconstruction with multiple patient-specific implants.
KW - Computer-assisted surgery
KW - four-wall defects
KW - navigation
KW - orbital reconstruction
KW - patient-specific implants
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133275034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133275034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008303
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008303
M3 - Article
C2 - 34802019
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 33
SP - 991
EP - 996
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 4
ER -