TY - JOUR
T1 - The compatibility of immunolabeling with STR profiling
AU - Achetib, Nihad
AU - van Weert, Angela
AU - Birkl, Magdalena
AU - van Leeuwen, Ton G.
AU - Aalders, Maurice C. G.
AU - van Dam, Annemieke
N1 - Funding Information: This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW , which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), and which is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs , Project number: 14430 . Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Immunolabeling is a technique, which has recently been introduced to enhance the quality of developed fingermarks and subsequently strengthen the evidential value. The effect of this method on subsequent DNA analysis, however, has not been explored yet. Therefore, the current pilot study aimed to determine whether STR profiling is possible after immunolabeling. Since immunolabeling involves washing steps which could reduce DNA quantities, the use of different fixatives including methanol, formaldehyde and universal molecular fixative (UMFIX) were investigated. STR profiles from the (immunolabeled) fingermarks were generated after four days and four weeks by a direct PCR method to enable comparison of relatively fresh and old fingermarks. The fingermarks were deposited on diverse forensically relevant substrates, including glass, metal and tile. STR profiles could be recovered for all tested fixatives with no significant difference in performance. However, the mean number of detected alleles was the highest when methanol was used for fixation. Furthermore, immunolabeling on aged fingermarks (4 weeks) was also possible, but the number of detected alleles showed a non-significant decrease. DNA could be recovered from deposits on all substrates, of which glass showed the highest mean number of detected alleles followed by metal and tile.
AB - Immunolabeling is a technique, which has recently been introduced to enhance the quality of developed fingermarks and subsequently strengthen the evidential value. The effect of this method on subsequent DNA analysis, however, has not been explored yet. Therefore, the current pilot study aimed to determine whether STR profiling is possible after immunolabeling. Since immunolabeling involves washing steps which could reduce DNA quantities, the use of different fixatives including methanol, formaldehyde and universal molecular fixative (UMFIX) were investigated. STR profiles from the (immunolabeled) fingermarks were generated after four days and four weeks by a direct PCR method to enable comparison of relatively fresh and old fingermarks. The fingermarks were deposited on diverse forensically relevant substrates, including glass, metal and tile. STR profiles could be recovered for all tested fixatives with no significant difference in performance. However, the mean number of detected alleles was the highest when methanol was used for fixation. Furthermore, immunolabeling on aged fingermarks (4 weeks) was also possible, but the number of detected alleles showed a non-significant decrease. DNA could be recovered from deposits on all substrates, of which glass showed the highest mean number of detected alleles followed by metal and tile.
KW - Ageing
KW - DNA
KW - Direct STR amplification
KW - Fingermark visualization techniques
KW - Fingerprints
KW - Immunolabeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101066106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102485
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102485
M3 - Article
C2 - 33636658
SN - 1872-4973
VL - 52
JO - Forensic science international. Genetics
JF - Forensic science international. Genetics
M1 - 102485
ER -