The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature

Mary J. van Schooneveld, L. Ingeborgh van den Born, Mies van Genderen, Jan-Geert Bollemeijer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

16 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	153; author reply 153-153; author reply 154
Journal	British journal of ophthalmology
Volume	95
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

@article{af4db6f2f57b4f1c8630beb64a866305,

title = "The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature",

author = "{van Schooneveld}, {Mary J.} and {van den Born}, {L. Ingeborgh} and {van Genderen}, Mies and Jan-Geert Bollemeijer",

year = "2011",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "153; author reply 153--153; author reply 154",

journal = "British journal of ophthalmology",

issn = "0007-1161",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature

AU - van Schooneveld, Mary J.

AU - van den Born, L. Ingeborgh

AU - van Genderen, Mies

AU - Bollemeijer, Jan-Geert

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

DO - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 20971790

SN - 0007-1161

VL - 95

SP - 153; author reply 153-153; author reply 154

JO - British journal of ophthalmology

JF - British journal of ophthalmology

IS - 1

ER -