TY - GEN
T1 - The effect of preprocessing on convolutional neural networks for medical image segmentation
AU - De Raad, K. B.
AU - Van Garderen, K. A.
AU - Smits, M.
AU - Van Der Voort, S. R.
AU - Incekara, F.
AU - Oei, E. H.G.
AU - Hirvasniemi, J.
AU - Klein, S.
AU - Starmans, M. P.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 IEEE.
PY - 2021/4/13
Y1 - 2021/4/13
N2 - In recent years, deep learning has become the leading method for medical image segmentation. While the majority of studies focus on developments of network architectures, several studies have shown that non-architectural factors also play a substantial role in performance improvement. An important factor is preprocessing. However, there is no agreement on which preprocessing steps work best for different applications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preprocessing on model performance. To this end, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 24 preprocessing configurations on three clinical application datasets (brain, liver, and knee). Different configurations of normalization, region of interest selection, bias field correction, and resampling methods were applied before training one convolutional neural network. Performance varied up to 64 percentage points between configurations within one dataset. Across the three datasets, different configurations performed best. In conclusion, to improve model performance, preprocessing should be tuned to the specific segmentation application.
AB - In recent years, deep learning has become the leading method for medical image segmentation. While the majority of studies focus on developments of network architectures, several studies have shown that non-architectural factors also play a substantial role in performance improvement. An important factor is preprocessing. However, there is no agreement on which preprocessing steps work best for different applications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preprocessing on model performance. To this end, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 24 preprocessing configurations on three clinical application datasets (brain, liver, and knee). Different configurations of normalization, region of interest selection, bias field correction, and resampling methods were applied before training one convolutional neural network. Performance varied up to 64 percentage points between configurations within one dataset. Across the three datasets, different configurations performed best. In conclusion, to improve model performance, preprocessing should be tuned to the specific segmentation application.
KW - Deep learning
KW - Performance
KW - Preprocessing
KW - Segmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107183802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9433952
DO - https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9433952
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
SP - 655
EP - 658
BT - 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2021
PB - IEEE Computer Society Press
T2 - 18th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2021
Y2 - 13 April 2021 through 16 April 2021
ER -