The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in the newborn lamb: Effects of loading and inotropic interventions

David F. Teitel, R. Klautz, P. Steendijk, E. T. van der Velde, F. van Bel, J. Baan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Indices of global systolic performance of the newborn left ventricle exceed those of the adult, despite isolated tissue studies showing immature contractile mechanisms. To evaluate contractility in situ, we investigated the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) by the conductance technique in nine newborn lambs. After percutaneous placement of catheters, we generated ESPVR by inferior vena cava occlusion, aortic occlusion, and volume infusion in two control states, during three levels of dobutamine infusion, and after propranolol. We performed linear and nonlinear regression analyses of the end-systolic points and derived the slope (Ees) and volume at 14 kPa pressure. We found that reliable ESPVR could be obtained in almost all inferior vena cava and aortic occlusions (50 of 51 in each), but in only 18 of 27 volume infusions. Overall, linear regressions adequately defined the ESPVR (75 of 102 were not statistically different than nonlinear regressions; of those different, the mean linear R2 was 0.934 ± 0.048). By multiple regression analysis, neither Ees nor volume at 14 kPa significantly changed with dobutamine, but both changed after propranolol (23% less than control and 54% greater, respectively), supporting previous studies showing a limited contractile reserve in the newborn secondary to high resting β-adrenergic tone. Neither Ees nor volume at 14 kPa was different between control states. However, Ees was 25% less steep when generated by inferior vena cava than by aortic occlusion. We conclude that the ESPVR can be generated reliably and reproducibly in the newborn lamb and is relatively linear and sensitive to changes in contractility, but that it is also sensitive to the technique of load intervention. © 1991 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-482
JournalPediatric Research
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Cite this