TY - JOUR
T1 - The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
T2 - II. Fluctuating noise
AU - Smits, Cas
AU - Festen, Joost M.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Following previous work [Smits and Festen. (2011). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2987-2998] involving the interpretation of speech reception threshold (SRT) data in steady-state noise, the present study considers fluctuating noise. Whereas the SIIsteady function [i.e., the speech intelligibility index (SII) against SNR in steady-state noise] can be approximated by a simple linear function going from 0 to 1 between SNR -15 dB to 15 dB, the SII fluc function is a function over a broader range than 30 dB and its maximum lies at a SNR higher than 15 dB. The difference in shape between the SIIsteady and SIIfluc functions has several implications. It predicts a reduction in fluctuating masker benefit (FMB), or even a negative FMB, for higher SNRs for normal-hearing listeners. Experimental data confirm this prediction. Much of the reduction in FMB for hearing-impaired listeners may be attributed to the higher SRTs in steady-state noise for these listeners.
AB - Following previous work [Smits and Festen. (2011). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2987-2998] involving the interpretation of speech reception threshold (SRT) data in steady-state noise, the present study considers fluctuating noise. Whereas the SIIsteady function [i.e., the speech intelligibility index (SII) against SNR in steady-state noise] can be approximated by a simple linear function going from 0 to 1 between SNR -15 dB to 15 dB, the SII fluc function is a function over a broader range than 30 dB and its maximum lies at a SNR higher than 15 dB. The difference in shape between the SIIsteady and SIIfluc functions has several implications. It predicts a reduction in fluctuating masker benefit (FMB), or even a negative FMB, for higher SNRs for normal-hearing listeners. Experimental data confirm this prediction. Much of the reduction in FMB for hearing-impaired listeners may be attributed to the higher SRTs in steady-state noise for these listeners.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877590740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4798667
DO - https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4798667
M3 - Article
C2 - 23654404
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 133
SP - 3004
EP - 3015
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 5
ER -