The use of 18F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy

Matthanja Bieze, Roelof J. Bennink, Youssef El-Massoudi, Saffire S. K. S. Phoa, Joanne Verheij, Ulrich Beuers, Thomas M. van Gulik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) using conventional imaging techniques can be difficult; however, it is important to differentiate between them as these benign liver tumors require different therapeutic strategies. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) with F-fluoromethylcholine (F-FCH) as a novel diagnostic approach in the differentiation between HCA and FNH. Fifty-six consecutive patients with a suspicion of one or multiple HCAs or FNHs larger than 2 cm were prospectively included after written informed consent was obtained from them. All the patients underwent a PET/CT with F-FCH. Histopathology of the lesions was the standard of reference. The ratio of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the lesions compared with normal liver uptake within the same patient was calculated. Statistical tests were evaluated at the 95% confidence interval. Forty-nine patients with 60 lesions and histopathological diagnosis of FNH or HCA completed the study and were analyzed. The mean SUV ratio for FNH was 1.67±0.31 (mean±SD, n=28), resulting in a positive likelihood ratio of 32.3 for PET-positive FNH. The mean SUV ratio for HCA was 0.82±0.17 (n=32), with a likelihood ratio of ∼100 for PET-negative HCA. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an optimal SUV ratio cutoff value of 1.13, which reached 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity in differentiating FNH from HCA. This prospective study shows that PET/CT with F-FCH can accurately differentiate FNH from HCA and may become a valuable diagnostic tool when conventional imaging techniques fail to do so
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-154
JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this