The use of the Acucise technique for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a trade-off between efficacy and invasiveness?

Joyce Baard, Theodorus M. de Reijke, Jean J. M. C. H. de La Rosette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Open pyeloplasty is traditionally the recommended treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In the past decades, several less invasive procedures emerged with the advantages of lower morbidity and better patient tolerance. In 1993, an electrosurgical cutting balloon device called the Acucise (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) was introduced. It was presented as a straightforward, safe procedure that can be performed in a complete retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic guidance. Despite these advantages; however, it is not yet a generally excepted procedure. This is mainly due to the fact that specific patient selection is needed, and success rates are comparable with other already established endoscopic procedures. Considering the large variety of minimally invasive procedures available, treatment of choice must be based on several factors such as success rate, morbidity, cost, and surgeon's experience. Acucise is considered a good alternative for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in selected patients. However, the efficacy is significantly lower than the reference standard
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-139
JournalCurrent urology reports
Volume8
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this