TY - JOUR
T1 - Therapeutic Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus Type 16 for the Treatment of High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV+ Men
AU - Gosens, Karien C. M.
AU - van der Burg, Sjoerd H.
AU - Welters, Marij J. P.
AU - Boekestijn, Sanne
AU - Loof, Nikki M.
AU - Quint, Wim G. V.
AU - van Noesel, Carel J. M.
AU - van der Wal, Allard C.
AU - Richel, Olivier
AU - Krebber, Wilhelmus J. T. A.
AU - Melief, Cornelis J. M.
AU - de Vries, Henry J. C.
AU - Prins, Jan M.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant 95103003, and was supported by the (non-commercial) Stichting Pathologie Onderzoek en Ontwikkeling. We thank all participants in the trial. We thank Ilina Ehsan, Vanessa van Ham, and Lien van der Minne for their help with isolating PBMC from the blood samples (LUMC, Leiden); Hans-Erik Nobel for his help with trial management (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam); Henk van den Munckhof for his help with HPV-genotyping (DDL, Rijswijk); Sonja Visscher for her contribution in the early phase of the trial (ISA Pharmaceuticals, Oegstgeest); and Ciska van Doesum-Wolters for critical reading of the manuscript and valuable suggestions (ISA Pharmaceuticals, Oegstgeest). We thank the members of the DSMB: prof. R.J.M. ten Berge (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam), dr. F.P. Kroon (LUMC, Leiden), and prof. P.M.M. Bossuyt (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam). Funding Information: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant 95103003, and was supported by the (non-commercial) Stichting Pathologie Onderzoek en Ontwikkeling. Publisher Copyright: ©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2023/10/15
Y1 - 2023/10/15
N2 - Purpose: Anal cancer is increasing in HIVþ men who have sex with men (MSM). Treatment options for its precursor, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), are suboptimal. In this phase I to II dose-finding study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) synthetic long peptide vaccine (SLP-HPV-01) in HIVþ MSM with HPV16-positive HGAIN. Patients and Methods: Four dosage schedules (1-5-10; 5-10-20; 10-20-40; and 40-40-40-40 mg) of SLP-HPV-01 were administered intradermally with a 3-week interval in 10 patients per dose level (DL). In each dose group, 5 patients also received 1 mg/kg pegylated IFNa-2b subcutaneously. Primary endpoints were safety and regression of HGAIN at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Eighty-one of 134 screened patients (60%) had HPV16-negative HGAIN lesions, leaving 53 eligible patients. Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 40 men. The vaccine was well tolerated. One patient developed a generalized rash. The highest dosage level induced the strongest immune responses. There was no indication for stronger reactivity in the IFNa groups. Up to 18 months of follow-up, 8/38 intention-to-treat patients had a complete clinical and histologic response and one had a partial response (in total 9/38, 23.7%). At the highest dosage level, the clinical response was 4/10 (40%). Stronger immune responses were detected among clinical responders. Conclusions: The highest DL is safe, immunogenic, and associated with clinical responses to HPV16-induced lesions. However, as the majority of HGAIN is caused by the other HPV types, further studies should aim at pan-HPV vaccination to prevent or treat HGAIN.
AB - Purpose: Anal cancer is increasing in HIVþ men who have sex with men (MSM). Treatment options for its precursor, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), are suboptimal. In this phase I to II dose-finding study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) synthetic long peptide vaccine (SLP-HPV-01) in HIVþ MSM with HPV16-positive HGAIN. Patients and Methods: Four dosage schedules (1-5-10; 5-10-20; 10-20-40; and 40-40-40-40 mg) of SLP-HPV-01 were administered intradermally with a 3-week interval in 10 patients per dose level (DL). In each dose group, 5 patients also received 1 mg/kg pegylated IFNa-2b subcutaneously. Primary endpoints were safety and regression of HGAIN at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Eighty-one of 134 screened patients (60%) had HPV16-negative HGAIN lesions, leaving 53 eligible patients. Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 40 men. The vaccine was well tolerated. One patient developed a generalized rash. The highest dosage level induced the strongest immune responses. There was no indication for stronger reactivity in the IFNa groups. Up to 18 months of follow-up, 8/38 intention-to-treat patients had a complete clinical and histologic response and one had a partial response (in total 9/38, 23.7%). At the highest dosage level, the clinical response was 4/10 (40%). Stronger immune responses were detected among clinical responders. Conclusions: The highest DL is safe, immunogenic, and associated with clinical responses to HPV16-induced lesions. However, as the majority of HGAIN is caused by the other HPV types, further studies should aim at pan-HPV vaccination to prevent or treat HGAIN.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174752232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3361
DO - https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3361
M3 - Article
C2 - 37540563
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 29
SP - 4109
EP - 4117
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 20
ER -