Third-generation autofluorescence endoscopy for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot study

D. F. Boerwinkel, J. A. Holz, M. C. G. Aalders, M. Visser, S. L. Meijer, M. I. van Berge Henegouwen, B. L. A. M. Weusten, J. J. G. H. M. Bergman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Barrett's esophagus (BE), second-generation autofluorescence imaging (AFI-II) improves targeted detection of high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and early cancer (EC), yet suffers from high false-positive (FP) rates. The newest generation AFI (AFI-III) specifically targets fluorescence in malignant cells and may therefore improve detection of early neoplasia and reduce FP rate. The aim was to compare AFI-III with AFI-II for endoscopic detection of early neoplasia in BE. BE patients with endoscopically inconspicuous neoplasia underwent two diagnostic endoscopies (AFI-II/AFI-III) in a single session. End-points: number of patients and lesions with HGIN/EC detected with AFI-II and AFI-III after white-light endoscopy (WLE) and the value of reinspection of AFI-positive areas with WLE and narrow-band imaging. Forty-five patients were included (38 males, age 65 years). Nineteen patients showed HGIN/EC. AFI-II inspection after WLE increased detection of HGIN/EC from 9 to 15 patients (47 to 79%); AFI-III increased detection from 9 to 17 patients (47 to 89%). WLE plus random biopsies diagnosed 13/19 (68%) HGIN/EC patients. One hundred and four abnormal AFI areas were inspected; 23 (22%) showed HGIN/EC. AFI-II increased detection of HGIN/EC from 10 to 18 lesions (43 to 78%). AFI-III increased detection from 10 to 20 lesions (43-87%). FP rate was 86% for AFI-II and AFI-III. Reinspection with WLE or narrow-band imaging reduced FP rate to 21% and 22%, respectively, but misclassified HGIN/EC lesions as unsuspicious in 54% and 31%, respectively. This first feasibility study on third-generation AFI again showed improved targeted detection of HGIN/EC in BE. However, the results do not suggest AFI-III performs significantly better than conventional AFI-II
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-284
JournalDiseases of the Esophagus
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this