Understanding Outcomes with the EMBLEM S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients with Low EF Study (UNTOUCHED): Clinical characteristics and perioperative results

Lucas V. Boersma, Mikhael F. El-Chami, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Martin C. Burke, Reinoud E. Knops, Johan D. Aasbo, Pier D. Lambiase, Jean Claude Deharo, Andrea M. Russo, Jay Dinerman, Naushad Shaik, Craig S. Barr, Nathan Carter, Ursula Appl, Amy J. Brisben, Kenneth M. Stein, Michael R. Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has shown favorable outcomes in large registries with broad inclusion criteria. The cohorts reported had less heart disease and fewer comorbidities than standard ICD populations. Objective: The purpose of this study is to characterize acute performance for primary prevention patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (primary prevention ≤35%). Methods: Primary prevention ≤35% patients with no prior documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), pacing indication, end-stage heart failure, or advanced renal failure were prospectively enrolled. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time to event, and multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results: In 1112 of 1116 patients, an S-ICD was successfully implanted (99.6%). Predictors for longer procedure time included 3-incision technique, higher body mass index (BMI), performing defibrillation testing (DFT), imaging, younger age, black race, and European vs North American centers. Patients undergoing DFT (82%) were successfully converted (99.2%; 93.5% converting at ≤65 J). Higher BMI was predictive of failing DFT at ≤65 J. The rate of 30-day freedom from complications was 95.8%. Most complications involved postoperative healing (45%) or interventions after DFT or impedance check (19%). Conclusion: The procedural outcome data of UNTOUCHED reinforce that S-ICD therapy has low perioperative complication rates and high conversion efficacy of induced ventricular fibrillation, even in a higher-risk cohort with low LVEF and more comorbidities than previous S-ICD studies. Higher BMI warrants more careful attention to implant technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1636-1644
Number of pages9
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Arrhythmia
  • Heart failure
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Primary prevention
  • Subcutaneous ICD
  • Sudden cardiac death
  • Ventricular arrhythmia

Cite this