TY - JOUR
T1 - Using artificial intelligence to create diverse and inclusive medical case vignettes for education
AU - Bakkum, Michiel J
AU - Hartjes, Mariëlle G
AU - Piët, Joost D
AU - Donker, Erik M
AU - Likic, Robert
AU - Sanz, Emilio
AU - de Ponti, Fabrizio
AU - Verdonk, Petra
AU - Richir, Milan C
AU - van Agtmael, Michiel A
AU - Tichelaar, Jelle
N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the assistance of ChatGPT in copy‐editing the text of this article. It is important to note that ChatGPT was solely used as a tool for editing purposes (prompt: improve writing) and no content was generated by ChatGPT. This research was funded by the European Union under Erasmus+ grant 2020‐1‐NL01‐KA203‐083098. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
PY - 2023/11/28
Y1 - 2023/11/28
N2 - Aims: Medical case vignettes play a crucial role in medical education, yet they often fail to authentically represent diverse patients. Moreover, these vignettes tend to oversimplify the complex relationship between patient characteristics and medical conditions, leading to biased and potentially harmful perspectives among students. Displaying aspects of patient diversity, such as ethnicity, in written cases proves challenging. Additionally, creating these cases places a significant burden on teachers in terms of labour and time. Our objective is to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computer-generated clinical cases to expedite case creation and enhance diversity, along with AI-generated patient photographs for more lifelike portrayal. Methods: In this study, we employed ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT 3.5) to develop diverse and inclusive medical case vignettes. We evaluated various approaches and identified a set of eight consecutive prompts that can be readily customized to accommodate local contexts and specific assignments. To enhance visual representation, we utilized Adobe Firefly beta for image generation. Results: Using the described prompts, we consistently generated cases for various assignments, producing sets of 30 cases at a time. We ensured the inclusion of mandatory checks and formatting, completing the process within approximately 60 min per set. Conclusions: Our approach significantly accelerated case creation and improved diversity, although prioritizing maximum diversity compromised representativeness to some extent. While the optimized prompts are easily reusable, the process itself demands computer skills not all educators possess. To address this, we aim to share all created patients as open educational resources, empowering educators to create cases independently.
AB - Aims: Medical case vignettes play a crucial role in medical education, yet they often fail to authentically represent diverse patients. Moreover, these vignettes tend to oversimplify the complex relationship between patient characteristics and medical conditions, leading to biased and potentially harmful perspectives among students. Displaying aspects of patient diversity, such as ethnicity, in written cases proves challenging. Additionally, creating these cases places a significant burden on teachers in terms of labour and time. Our objective is to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computer-generated clinical cases to expedite case creation and enhance diversity, along with AI-generated patient photographs for more lifelike portrayal. Methods: In this study, we employed ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT 3.5) to develop diverse and inclusive medical case vignettes. We evaluated various approaches and identified a set of eight consecutive prompts that can be readily customized to accommodate local contexts and specific assignments. To enhance visual representation, we utilized Adobe Firefly beta for image generation. Results: Using the described prompts, we consistently generated cases for various assignments, producing sets of 30 cases at a time. We ensured the inclusion of mandatory checks and formatting, completing the process within approximately 60 min per set. Conclusions: Our approach significantly accelerated case creation and improved diversity, although prioritizing maximum diversity compromised representativeness to some extent. While the optimized prompts are easily reusable, the process itself demands computer skills not all educators possess. To address this, we aim to share all created patients as open educational resources, empowering educators to create cases independently.
KW - ChatGPT
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - diversity and inclusivity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181682461&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38016816
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15977
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15977
M3 - Article
C2 - 38016816
SN - 0306-5251
JO - British journal of clinical pharmacology
JF - British journal of clinical pharmacology
ER -