TY - JOUR
T1 - Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department
T2 - A single-centre, retrospective, observational study
AU - Boerman, Anneroos W.
AU - Schinkel, Michiel
AU - Meijerink, Lotta
AU - van den Ende, Eva S.
AU - Pladet, Lara Ca
AU - Scholtemeijer, Martijn G.
AU - Zeeuw, Joost
AU - van der Zaag, Anuschka Y.
AU - Minderhoud, Tanca C.
AU - Elbers, Paul W. G.
AU - Wiersinga, W. Joost
AU - de Jonge, Robert
AU - Kramer, Mark Hh
AU - Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding This project was funded by a research grant (no grant number available) from the Dutch federation for acute internal medicine (NVIAG). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/4
Y1 - 2022/1/4
N2 - Objectives To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. Participants Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. Results In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. Conclusions Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation.
AB - Objectives To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. Participants Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. Results In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. Conclusions Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation.
KW - accident & emergency medicine
KW - diagnostic microbiology
KW - internal medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122751909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122751909&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983764
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332
DO - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332
M3 - Article
C2 - 34983764
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - e053332
ER -