TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation Study of Novel Point-of-Care Tests for Infliximab, Adalimumab and C-Reactive Protein in Capillary Blood and Calprotectin in Faeces in an Ambulatory Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care Setting
AU - Volkers, Adriaan
AU - Löwenberg, Mark
AU - Braad, Marlou
AU - Abeling, Yara
AU - Gecse, Krisztina
AU - Berkers, Nicole
AU - Montazeri, Nahid
AU - D’Haens, Geert
N1 - Funding Information: This study investigator-initiated was funded by ProciseDx (ProciseDx, San Diego, CA, USA). The sponsor approved the protocol prior to the start of the study. The sponsor had the opportunity to review the manuscript and suggested to add an extra IFX CWB analysis in which timing errors were excluded. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Background and aims: Point-of-care tests (POCT) allow instant measurement of inflammatory markers and drug concentrations. Here, we studied agreement between a novel POCT device and reference methods of measuring infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) serum concentrations and C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP) concentrations of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In this single-centre validation study, IBD patients were recruited in which IFX, ADL, CRP and/or FCP tests were required. IFX, ADL and CRP POCT were performed on capillary whole blood (CWB), obtained via finger prick. Additionally, IFX POCT was performed on serum samples. FCP POCT was performed on stool samples. Agreement between POCT and reference methods was tested using Passing–Bablok regression, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Results: In total, 285 patients participated. Passing–Bablok regression identified differences between the reference method and IFX CWB POCT (intercept = 1.56), IFX serum POCT (intercept = 0.71, slope = 1.10) and ADL CWB POCT (intercept = 1.44). There were also differences in the Passing–Bablok regressions of CRP (intercept = 0.81, slope = 0.78) and FCP (intercept = 51 and slope = 0.46). Bland–Altman plots demonstrated that IFX and ADL concentrations were slightly higher with the POCT and CRP and FCP were slightly lower with POCT. The ICC demonstrated almost perfect agreement with IFX CWB POCT (ICC = 0.85), IFX serum POCT (ICC = 0.96), ADL CWB POCT (ICC = 0.82) and CRP CWB POCT (ICC = 0.91) and moderate agreement with FCP POCT (ICC = 0.55). Conclusions: IFX and ADL results were slightly higher with this novel rapid and user-friendly POCT, whereas CRP and FCP results were slightly lower compared to the reference methods.
AB - Background and aims: Point-of-care tests (POCT) allow instant measurement of inflammatory markers and drug concentrations. Here, we studied agreement between a novel POCT device and reference methods of measuring infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) serum concentrations and C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP) concentrations of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In this single-centre validation study, IBD patients were recruited in which IFX, ADL, CRP and/or FCP tests were required. IFX, ADL and CRP POCT were performed on capillary whole blood (CWB), obtained via finger prick. Additionally, IFX POCT was performed on serum samples. FCP POCT was performed on stool samples. Agreement between POCT and reference methods was tested using Passing–Bablok regression, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Results: In total, 285 patients participated. Passing–Bablok regression identified differences between the reference method and IFX CWB POCT (intercept = 1.56), IFX serum POCT (intercept = 0.71, slope = 1.10) and ADL CWB POCT (intercept = 1.44). There were also differences in the Passing–Bablok regressions of CRP (intercept = 0.81, slope = 0.78) and FCP (intercept = 51 and slope = 0.46). Bland–Altman plots demonstrated that IFX and ADL concentrations were slightly higher with the POCT and CRP and FCP were slightly lower with POCT. The ICC demonstrated almost perfect agreement with IFX CWB POCT (ICC = 0.85), IFX serum POCT (ICC = 0.96), ADL CWB POCT (ICC = 0.82) and CRP CWB POCT (ICC = 0.91) and moderate agreement with FCP POCT (ICC = 0.55). Conclusions: IFX and ADL results were slightly higher with this novel rapid and user-friendly POCT, whereas CRP and FCP results were slightly lower compared to the reference methods.
KW - Crohn’s disease
KW - anti-tumour necrosis factor
KW - biomarkers
KW - follow-up
KW - inflammatory bowel diseases
KW - point-of care
KW - ulcerative colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160566994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101712
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101712
M3 - Article
C2 - 37238198
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 13
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 10
M1 - 1712
ER -