Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD

Minha Hong; J. J. Sandra Kooij; Bongseog Kim; Yoo-Sook Joung; Hanik K. Yoo; Eui-Jung Kim; Soyoung Irene Lee; Soo-Young Bhang; Seung Yup Lee; Doug Hyun Han; Young Sik Lee; Geon Ho Bahn

doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD

Minha Hong, J. J. Sandra Kooij, Bongseog Kim, Yoo-Sook Joung, Hanik K. Yoo, Eui-Jung Kim, Soyoung Irene Lee, Soo-Young Bhang, Seung Yup Lee, Doug Hyun Han, Young Sik Lee, Geon Ho Bahn

Psychiatry (VUmc)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semistructured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD. Methods: A total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed. Results: The DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found. Conclusion: The Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2371-2376
Number of pages	6
Journal	Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Volume	16
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995
Publication status	Published - 2020

Keywords

Adult ADHD
DIVA-5
Korean
Validity

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

Cite this

Hong, M., Kooij, J. J. S., Kim, B., Joung, Y.-S., Yoo, H. K., Kim, E.-J., Lee, S. I., Bhang, S.-Y., Lee, S. Y., Han, D. H., Lee, Y. S., & Bahn, G. H. (2020). Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 16, 2371-2376. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

@article{54ff9d933ce3403ea6cb0f4ab3a95d16,

title = "Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD",

abstract = "Background: This study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semistructured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD. Methods: A total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed. Results: The DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found. Conclusion: The Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.",

keywords = "Adult ADHD, DIVA-5, Korean, Validity",

author = "Minha Hong and Kooij, {J. J. Sandra} and Bongseog Kim and Yoo-Sook Joung and Yoo, {Hanik K.} and Eui-Jung Kim and Lee, {Soyoung Irene} and Soo-Young Bhang and Lee, {Seung Yup} and Han, {Doug Hyun} and Lee, {Young Sik} and Bahn, {Geon Ho}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Hong et al.",

year = "2020",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "2371--2376",

journal = "Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment",

issn = "1176-6328",

publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

Hong, M, Kooij, JJS, Kim, B, Joung, Y-S, Yoo, HK, Kim, E-J, Lee, SI, Bhang, S-Y, Lee, SY, Han, DH, Lee, YS & Bahn, GH 2020, 'Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD', Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 16, pp. 2371-2376. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD

T2 - A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD

AU - Hong, Minha

AU - Kooij, J. J. Sandra

AU - Kim, Bongseog

AU - Joung, Yoo-Sook

AU - Yoo, Hanik K.

AU - Kim, Eui-Jung

AU - Lee, Soyoung Irene

AU - Bhang, Soo-Young

AU - Lee, Seung Yup

AU - Han, Doug Hyun

AU - Lee, Young Sik

AU - Bahn, Geon Ho

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: This study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semistructured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD. Methods: A total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed. Results: The DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found. Conclusion: The Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.

AB - Background: This study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semistructured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD. Methods: A total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed. Results: The DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found. Conclusion: The Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.

KW - Adult ADHD

KW - DIVA-5

KW - Korean

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092474711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

DO - https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S262995

M3 - Article

C2 - 33116536

SN - 1176-6328

VL - 16

SP - 2371

EP - 2376

JO - Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

JF - Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

ER -

Validity of the Korean version of DIVA-5: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD: A semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this