TY - JOUR
T1 - Ventricular response to stress predicts outcome in adult patients with a systemic right ventricle
AU - Winter, Michiel M.
AU - Scherptong, Roderick W. C.
AU - Kumar, Sabina
AU - Bouma, Berto J.
AU - Tulevski, Igor I.
AU - Tops, Laurens F.
AU - Roest, Arno A. W.
AU - Vliegen, Hubert W.
AU - de Roos, Albert
AU - Groenink, Maarten
AU - Mulder, Barbara J. M.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background Previous studies demonstrated that ventricular response to stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently abnormal in patients with a systemic right ventricle (RV). However, the clinical implications of these findings remained unknown. We sought to evaluate whether abnormal response to stress CMR predicts adverse outcome in patients with a systemic RV. Methods Thirty-nine adult patients (54% male;mean age 26, range 18-65 years) with a systemic RV underwent stress CMR to determine the response of RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF). During follow-up, cardiac events, defined as hospitalization for heart failure, cardiac surgery, aborted cardiac arrest, or death, were recorded. The prognostic value of an abnormal response to stress, defined as lack of a decrease in RV end-systolic volume (ESV) or lack of an increase in RV EF, was assessed. Results We frequently observed an abnormal response to stress, as RV ESV did not decrease in 17 patients (44%), and RV EF did not increase in 15 patients (38%). After a mean follow-up period of 8.1 years, 8 (21%) patients had reached the composite end point. The inability to decrease RV ESV during stress was predictive for cardiac events with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.19-88.72, P=.034), as was the inability to increase RV EF with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.31-81.59, P=.027). Conclusions Stress CMR potentially has important prognostic value in patients with a systemic RV. Patients with a systemic RV who show abnormal cardiac response to stress have a substantially higher risk of adverse outcome. (Am Heart J 2010;160:870-6.)
AB - Background Previous studies demonstrated that ventricular response to stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently abnormal in patients with a systemic right ventricle (RV). However, the clinical implications of these findings remained unknown. We sought to evaluate whether abnormal response to stress CMR predicts adverse outcome in patients with a systemic RV. Methods Thirty-nine adult patients (54% male;mean age 26, range 18-65 years) with a systemic RV underwent stress CMR to determine the response of RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF). During follow-up, cardiac events, defined as hospitalization for heart failure, cardiac surgery, aborted cardiac arrest, or death, were recorded. The prognostic value of an abnormal response to stress, defined as lack of a decrease in RV end-systolic volume (ESV) or lack of an increase in RV EF, was assessed. Results We frequently observed an abnormal response to stress, as RV ESV did not decrease in 17 patients (44%), and RV EF did not increase in 15 patients (38%). After a mean follow-up period of 8.1 years, 8 (21%) patients had reached the composite end point. The inability to decrease RV ESV during stress was predictive for cardiac events with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.19-88.72, P=.034), as was the inability to increase RV EF with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.31-81.59, P=.027). Conclusions Stress CMR potentially has important prognostic value in patients with a systemic RV. Patients with a systemic RV who show abnormal cardiac response to stress have a substantially higher risk of adverse outcome. (Am Heart J 2010;160:870-6.)
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.015
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 21095274
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 160
SP - 870
EP - 876
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -