TY - JOUR
T1 - Viral replication under combination antiretroviral therapy
T2 - A comparison of four different regimens
AU - Ghani, Azra C.
AU - Ferguson, Neil M.
AU - Fraser, Christophe
AU - Donnelly, Christl A.
AU - Danner, Sven
AU - Reiss, Peter
AU - Lange, Joep
AU - Goudsmit, Jaap
AU - Anderson, Roy M.
AU - De Wolf, Frank
PY - 2002/6/1
Y1 - 2002/6/1
N2 - A mathematical model of the interaction among CD4+ T-cells, HIV-1, and antiretroviral drugs was fitted to the viral load decline following initiation of combination therapy to estimate differences in the residual reproductive capacity of virus (R0) in the average patient in each group. Four regimens were studied: 12 patients on 5-drug nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitor (PI)-containing combination therapy, 11 patients on PI-containing triple therapy, 10 patients on double NRTI therapy, and 10 patients on NNRTI- containing triple therapy. Model fits were used to estimate R0. The NNRTI-containing triple therapy and the 5-drug regimen blocked viral replication to the greatest extent (R0 = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91; and 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98, respectively), with the former being significantly better than the PI-containing triple regimen (R0 = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.03; p = .007). Both the NNRTI-containing and the 5-drug regimen, as well as the PIcontaining triple therapy, were significantly better at blocking viral replication than the double NRTI therapy (RO = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.07). Measurement of viral load after approximately 7 days provided the most accurate measure of the degree of viral suppression induced by a given drug regimen.
AB - A mathematical model of the interaction among CD4+ T-cells, HIV-1, and antiretroviral drugs was fitted to the viral load decline following initiation of combination therapy to estimate differences in the residual reproductive capacity of virus (R0) in the average patient in each group. Four regimens were studied: 12 patients on 5-drug nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitor (PI)-containing combination therapy, 11 patients on PI-containing triple therapy, 10 patients on double NRTI therapy, and 10 patients on NNRTI- containing triple therapy. Model fits were used to estimate R0. The NNRTI-containing triple therapy and the 5-drug regimen blocked viral replication to the greatest extent (R0 = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91; and 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98, respectively), with the former being significantly better than the PI-containing triple regimen (R0 = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.03; p = .007). Both the NNRTI-containing and the 5-drug regimen, as well as the PIcontaining triple therapy, were significantly better at blocking viral replication than the double NRTI therapy (RO = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.07). Measurement of viral load after approximately 7 days provided the most accurate measure of the degree of viral suppression induced by a given drug regimen.
KW - Antiretroviral therapy
KW - Mathematical model
KW - Viral replication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036603047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-200206010-00005
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-200206010-00005
M3 - Article
C2 - 12045679
SN - 1525-4135
VL - 30
SP - 167
EP - 176
JO - JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES
JF - JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES
IS - 2
ER -