What information sources do Dutch medical specialists use in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study

Floris S. Weller, Jaap F. Hamming, Sjoerd Repping, Leti van Bodegom-Vos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore what information sources medical specialists currently use to inform their medical decision-making. DESIGN: Qualitative, semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20 semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 surgeons and 10 internal medicine specialists who work in academic and/or regional hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Medical specialists reported that they primarily rely on their general knowledge and experience, rather than actively using information sources. The sources they use to update their knowledge can be categorised into 'scientific publications', 'guidelines or protocols', and 'presentations and meetings'. When medical specialists feel their general knowledge and experience are insufficient, they use three different approaches to find answers in response to clinical questions: consulting a colleague, actively searching the literature and asking someone else to search the literature. CONCLUSION: Medical specialists use information sources to update their general knowledge and to find answers to specific clinical questions when they feel their general knowledge and experience are insufficient. An important finding is that medical specialists prefer accessible information sources (eg, consulting colleagues) over existing evidence-based medicine tools.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere073905
Pages (from-to)e073905
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • clinical decision-making
  • clinical reasoning
  • education & training (see medical education & training)
  • information management
  • qualitative research

Cite this