What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators’ Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project

Lena M. Jakobsen, Bert Molewijk, Janine de Snoo-Trimp, Mia Svantesson, G. ril Ursin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The evaluation of the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes project (Euro-MCD) has resulted in a revised evaluation instrument, knowledge about the content of MCD (moral case deliberation), and the perspectives of those involved. In this paper, we report on a perspective that has been overlooked, the facilitators’. We aim to describe facilitators’ perceptions of high-quality moral case deliberation and their Euro-MCD sessions. The research took place in Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands using a survey combined with interviews with 41 facilitators. Facilitators’ perceived that attaining a high-quality MCD implies fostering a safe and respectful atmosphere, creating a wondering mode, being an attentive authority, developing moral reflective skills, reaching a common understanding, and ensuring organisational prerequisites for the MCD sessions. Our central conclusion is that efforts at three levels are required to attain a high-quality MCD: trained and virtuous facilitator; committed, respectful participants; and organizational space. Furthermore, managers have a responsibility to prepare MCD participants for what it means to take part in MCD.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHEC Forum
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Keywords

  • Clinical ethics
  • Ethics support
  • Ethics training
  • Euro-MCD
  • Facilitator
  • Reflection groups

Cite this