TY - JOUR
T1 - What is a meaningful pain reduction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1?
AU - Forouzanfar, Tymour
AU - Weber, Wilhelm E.J.
AU - Kemler, Marius
AU - Van Kleef, Maarten
PY - 2003/9/1
Y1 - 2003/9/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate the degree of pain reduction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS 1) that can be defined as "successful." Design: All patients rated their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10) before treatment and on three occasions after treatment, at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients also rated a Global Perceived Effect (GPE) for their pain relief at the same time periods. The GPE items were classified as "successful" or "unsuccessful." The mean absolute and relative pain reduction (using the VAS) was calculated for both "successful" and "unsuccessful" GPE classifications for each time period. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Patients: Sixty-one patients with CRPS 1. Results: The patients defined a relative pain reduction of 58% (SD, 23.4) or more as "successful," whereas in "successful" and "unsuccessful" patient groups the pain was reduced significantly on the VAS. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity analyses showed that a cut-off point of 50% relative pain reduction and a 3-cm absolute pain reduction on the VAS have the highest likelihood that patients will report their treatment "successful" on the GPE. Conclusions: Relative pain reduction of 50% or more and an absolute pain reduction of at least 3 cm on the VAS are accurate in predicting a successful pain reduction after a given treatment.
AB - Objective: To investigate the degree of pain reduction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS 1) that can be defined as "successful." Design: All patients rated their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10) before treatment and on three occasions after treatment, at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients also rated a Global Perceived Effect (GPE) for their pain relief at the same time periods. The GPE items were classified as "successful" or "unsuccessful." The mean absolute and relative pain reduction (using the VAS) was calculated for both "successful" and "unsuccessful" GPE classifications for each time period. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Patients: Sixty-one patients with CRPS 1. Results: The patients defined a relative pain reduction of 58% (SD, 23.4) or more as "successful," whereas in "successful" and "unsuccessful" patient groups the pain was reduced significantly on the VAS. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity analyses showed that a cut-off point of 50% relative pain reduction and a 3-cm absolute pain reduction on the VAS have the highest likelihood that patients will report their treatment "successful" on the GPE. Conclusions: Relative pain reduction of 50% or more and an absolute pain reduction of at least 3 cm on the VAS are accurate in predicting a successful pain reduction after a given treatment.
KW - Complex regional pain syndrome type 1
KW - Global Perceived Effect
KW - Relative pain reduction
KW - Visual analog scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042693081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200309000-00001
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200309000-00001
M3 - Article
C2 - 12966253
SN - 0749-8047
VL - 19
SP - 281
EP - 285
JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain
JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain
IS - 5
ER -