Williams-Beuren syndrome in diverse populations

Paul Kruszka, Antonio R Porras, Deise Helena de Souza, Angélica Moresco, Victoria Huckstadt, Ashleigh D Gill, Alec P Boyle, Tommy Hu, Yonit A Addissie, Gary T K Mok, Cedrik Tekendo-Ngongang, Karen Fieggen, Eloise J Prijoles, Pranoot Tanpaiboon, Engela Honey, Ho-Ming Luk, Ivan F M Lo, Meow-Keong Thong, Premala Muthukumarasamy, Kelly L JonesKhadija Belhassan, Karim Ouldim, Ihssane El Bouchikhi, Laila Bouguenouch, Anju Shukla, Katta M Girisha, Nirmala D Sirisena, Vajira H W Dissanayake, C Sampath Paththinige, Rupesh Mishra, Monisha S Kisling, Carlos R Ferreira, María Beatriz de Herreros, Ni-Chung Lee, Saumya S Jamuar, Angeline Lai, Ee Shien Tan, Jiin Ying Lim, Cham Breana Wen-Min, Neerja Gupta, Stephanie Lotz-Esquivel, Ramsés Badilla-Porras, Dalia Farouk Hussen, Mona O El Ruby, Engy A Ashaat, Siddaramappa J Patil, Leah Dowsett, Alison Eaton, A Micheil Innes, Vorasuk Shotelersuk, Ëben Badoe, Ambroise Wonkam, María Gabriela Obregon, Brian H Y Chung, Milana Trubnykova, Jorge La Serna, Bertha Elena Gallardo Jugo, Miguel Chávez Pastor, Hugo Hernán Abarca Barriga, Andre Megarbane, Beth A Kozel, Mieke M van Haelst, Roger E Stevenson, Marshall Summar, A Adebowale Adeyemo, Colleen A Morris, Danilo Moretti-Ferreira, Marius George Linguraru, Maximilian Muenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a common microdeletion syndrome characterized by a 1.5Mb deletion in 7q11.23. The phenotype of WBS has been well described in populations of European descent with not as much attention given to other ethnicities. In this study, individuals with WBS from diverse populations were assessed clinically and by facial analysis technology. Clinical data and images from 137 individuals with WBS were found in 19 countries with an average age of 11 years and female gender of 45%. The most common clinical phenotype elements were periorbital fullness and intellectual disability which were present in greater than 90% of our cohort. Additionally, 75% or greater of all individuals with WBS had malar flattening, long philtrum, wide mouth, and small jaw. Using facial analysis technology, we compared 286 Asian, African, Caucasian, and Latin American individuals with WBS with 286 gender and age matched controls and found that the accuracy to discriminate between WBS and controls was 0.90 when the entire cohort was evaluated concurrently. The test accuracy of the facial recognition technology increased significantly when the cohort was analyzed by specific ethnic population (P-value < 0.001 for all comparisons), with accuracies for Caucasian, African, Asian, and Latin American groups of 0.92, 0.96, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. In summary, we present consistent clinical findings from global populations with WBS and demonstrate how facial analysis technology can support clinicians in making accurate WBS diagnoses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1128-1136
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Volume176
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Keywords

  • Anthropometry/methods
  • Biological Variation, Population
  • Facies
  • Genetic Heterogeneity
  • Humans
  • Phenotype
  • Population Groups
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Williams Syndrome/diagnosis

Cite this