TY - JOUR
T1 - Work-related and personal risk factors for occupational contact dermatitis
T2 - A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
AU - Schütte, Marijke G.
AU - Tamminga, Sietske J.
AU - de Groene, Gerda J.
AU - Kezic, Sanja
AU - van der Molen, Henk F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The objective of this review is to identify work-related and personal risk factors for contact dermatitis (CD), and assess their association with this frequently occurring occupational disease. A systematic review of the literature from 1990 to June 2, 2020, was conducted using Medline and Embase. Prospective cohort and case–control studies were included, and meta-analyses were conducted when feasible. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Twenty-nine studies were identified, comprising 26 study populations and with a total of 846 209 participants investigating 52 risk factors for CD. Meta-analyses were performed for five risk factors, all of them for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Moderate-quality evidence was found for associations between wet work and ICD (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.21–2.01). High-quality evidence was found for the association between atopic dermatitis and ICD (OR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.89–3.15). There was no evidence for an association between ICD and sex or history of hand dermatitis, respiratory and mucosal atopy. In conclusion, several work-related and personal risk factors associated with CD were identified. Our data emphasize the need for the assessment of both, work-related and personal, risk factors to prevent occupational CD.
AB - The objective of this review is to identify work-related and personal risk factors for contact dermatitis (CD), and assess their association with this frequently occurring occupational disease. A systematic review of the literature from 1990 to June 2, 2020, was conducted using Medline and Embase. Prospective cohort and case–control studies were included, and meta-analyses were conducted when feasible. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Twenty-nine studies were identified, comprising 26 study populations and with a total of 846 209 participants investigating 52 risk factors for CD. Meta-analyses were performed for five risk factors, all of them for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Moderate-quality evidence was found for associations between wet work and ICD (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.21–2.01). High-quality evidence was found for the association between atopic dermatitis and ICD (OR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.89–3.15). There was no evidence for an association between ICD and sex or history of hand dermatitis, respiratory and mucosal atopy. In conclusion, several work-related and personal risk factors associated with CD were identified. Our data emphasize the need for the assessment of both, work-related and personal, risk factors to prevent occupational CD.
KW - contact dermatitis
KW - occupational disease
KW - occupational exposure
KW - personal risk factors
KW - prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144103291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14253
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14253
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36444496
SN - 0105-1873
JO - Contact dermatitis
JF - Contact dermatitis
ER -