TY - JOUR
T1 - Workflow patterns and potential for optimization in endovascular stroke treatment across the world: Results from a multinational survey
AU - Ospel, Johanna Maria
AU - Almekhlafi, Mohammed A.
AU - Menon, Bijoy K.
AU - Kashani, Nima
AU - Chapot, René
AU - Fiehler, Jens
AU - Hassan, Ameer E.
AU - Yavagal, Dileep
AU - Majoie, Charles B. L. M.
AU - Jayaraman, Mahesh V.
AU - Hill, Michael D.
AU - Goyal, Mayank
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Background: The benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) is highly time-dependent, and treatment delays reduce patients' chances to achieve a good outcome. In this survey-based study, we aimed to evaluate current in-hospital EVT workflow characteristics across different countries and hospital settings, and to quantify the time-savings that could be achieved by optimizing particular workflow steps. Methods: In a multinational survey, neurointerventionalists were asked to provide specific information about EVT workflows in their current working environment. Workflow characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and stratified by country and physician characteristics, such as age, career stage, personal and institutional caseload. Results: Among 248 respondents from 48 countries, pre-notification of the neurointerventional team was used in 70% of cases. The emergency department (ED) and CT scanner, and the CT scanner and neuroangiography suite, were on different floors in 23% and 38%, respectively. Redundant procedures in the ED were often routinely performed, such as chest x-rays (in 6%). General anesthesia was the most frequently used anesthesia protocol for EVT (42%), and an anesthesiologist was available in 82% for this purpose. 52% of the participants used a pre-prepared EVT kit. Conclusion: The current structure of EVT workflows offers possibilities for improvement. While some bottlenecks, such as the spatial department set-up, cannot easily be resolved, pre-notification tools and pre-prepared EVT kits are more straightforward to implement and could help to reduce treatment delays, and thereby improve patient outcomes.
AB - Background: The benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) is highly time-dependent, and treatment delays reduce patients' chances to achieve a good outcome. In this survey-based study, we aimed to evaluate current in-hospital EVT workflow characteristics across different countries and hospital settings, and to quantify the time-savings that could be achieved by optimizing particular workflow steps. Methods: In a multinational survey, neurointerventionalists were asked to provide specific information about EVT workflows in their current working environment. Workflow characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and stratified by country and physician characteristics, such as age, career stage, personal and institutional caseload. Results: Among 248 respondents from 48 countries, pre-notification of the neurointerventional team was used in 70% of cases. The emergency department (ED) and CT scanner, and the CT scanner and neuroangiography suite, were on different floors in 23% and 38%, respectively. Redundant procedures in the ED were often routinely performed, such as chest x-rays (in 6%). General anesthesia was the most frequently used anesthesia protocol for EVT (42%), and an anesthesiologist was available in 82% for this purpose. 52% of the participants used a pre-prepared EVT kit. Conclusion: The current structure of EVT workflows offers possibilities for improvement. While some bottlenecks, such as the spatial department set-up, cannot easily be resolved, pre-notification tools and pre-prepared EVT kits are more straightforward to implement and could help to reduce treatment delays, and thereby improve patient outcomes.
KW - brain
KW - stroke
KW - thrombectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083252101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015902
DO - https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015902
M3 - Article
C2 - 32253281
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 12
SP - 1194
EP - 1198
JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
IS - 12
M1 - 2020015902
ER -