Worse clinical outcome but similar graft patency in women versus men one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery owing to an excess of exposed risk factors in women. CABADAS. Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Coronary Artery Bypass graft occlusion by Aspirin, Dipyridamole and Acenocoumarol/phenoprocoumon Study

E. S. Tan, J. van der Meer, P. Jan de Kam, P. H. Dunselman, B. J. Mulder, C. A. Ascoop, M. Pfisterer, K. I. Lie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study sought to assess differences in graft patency and clinical outcome between women and men after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: A less favorable clinical outcome has been reported in women as compared with men. Its relation to graft patency has not been studied. METHODS: We analyzed one-year follow-up data of 912 patients (120 women) who entered a randomized clinical drug trial. All patients received vein grafts; in 494 patients (56 women) internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts were also used. Graft patency was assessed by coronary angiography at one year. Primary clinical end points were myocardial infarction, revascularization procedures and death; secondary clinical end points included recurrent angina, heart failure and arrhythmias. RESULTS: Occlusion rates of vein grafts were 16.7% in women and 12.4% in men (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 to 3.00, p = 0.12); occlusion rates of IMA grafts were 3.4% and 5.7% in women and men, respectively (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.08 to 3.96, p = 0.56). Primary clinical end points were observed in 16.7% of women and 9.2% of men (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.34, p = 0.022), and any clinical end point in 41.7% of women and 25.8% of men (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.04, p = 0.0004). Myocardial infarction (15% vs. 7.6%, OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.75, p = 0.013) and recurrent angina (26.7% vs. 15.4%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.11, p = 0.004) occurred most frequently. Multivariate regression analysis did not identify gender as an independent risk factor for graft occlusion or the clinical end points. Graft occlusion was an independent predictor of the composite primary clinical end point (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.75, p = 0.0003) and each of the secondary clinical end points. The observed differences were due to an imbalance of risk factors at baseline and to surgical and graft characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: One-year occlusion rates of vein and IMA grafts were comparable in women and men. Clinical outcome was related to graft patency and was less favorable in women owing to their uneven distribution of risk factors among both groups
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1760-1768
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Cite this