Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia

Elisabeth H. Thijssen, Inge M. W. Verberk, Jana Kindermans, Adlin Abramian, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Andrew J. Ball, Yolande Pijnenburg, Afina W. Lemstra, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Erik Stoops, Christophe Hirtz, Charlotte E. Teunissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: We explored what combination of blood-based biomarkers (amyloid beta [Aβ]1-42/1-40, phosphorylated tau [p-tau]181, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods: We measured the biomarkers with Simoa in two separate cohorts (n = 160 and n = 152). In one cohort, Aβ1-42/1-40 was also measured with mass spectrometry (MS). We assessed the differential diagnostic value of the markers, by logistic regression with Wald's backward selection. Results: MS and Simoa Aβ1-42/1-40 similarly differentiated AD from controls. The Simoa panel that optimally differentiated AD from FTD consisted of NfL and p-tau181 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94; cohort 1) or NfL, GFAP, and p-tau181 (AUC = 0.90; cohort 2). For AD from DLB, the panel consisted of NfL, p-tau181, and GFAP (AUC = 0.88; cohort 1), and only p-tau181 (AUC = 0.81; cohort 2). Discussion: A combination of plasma p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ1-42/1-40, might be useful to discriminate AD, FTD, and DLB.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12285
JournalAlzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • amyloid beta
  • blood biomarker
  • glial fibrillary acidic protein
  • neurofilament light
  • phosphorylated tau

Cite this