Evidence for a role of anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies despite normal ADAMTS13 activity in recurrent thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Rahel Froehlich-Zahnd, James N. George, Sara K. Vesely, Deirdra R. Terrell, Khatira Aboulfatova, Jing-Fei Dong, Brenda M. Luken, Jan Voorberg, Ulrich Budde, Irmela Sulzer, Bernhard Lämmle, Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Severe ADAMTS13 deficiency is a critical component of the pathogenesis of idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura but is found only in about 60% of patients clinically diagnosed with this disease. Over a period of 8 years and six episodes of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura we studied the evolution of the anti-ADAMTS13 antibody response in a patient using different ADAMTS13 assays and epitope mapping. Anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies were found in all episodes but were inhibitory only in the last two episodes. In a flow-based assay, normal ADAMTS13 activity was found only during the first disease episode, while ADAMTS13 activity was normal using a static assay in episodes 1 and 3, and severely deficient in the last two episodes. Fluorescence evolution in a modified fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay using a von Willebrand factor A2 domain peptide substrate was linear in episodes 1, 5 and 6, but increased exponentially in episodes 3 and 4. Despite the variable functional characteristics of the anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, their principal epitope was the ADAMTS13 spacer domain in all episodes. The patient is unique as he displayed features of maturation or shaping of the anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibody response during the course of multiple episodes of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies may be important in vivo despite normal ADAMTS13 activity in routine assays. Consequently, treatment decisions should not be based solely on activity assay results
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-303
JournalHaematologica
Volume97
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this